Why Does My Ideal Gas Formula Derivation Not Include Moles?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivation of a formula related to the ideal gas law, specifically focusing on the expression for heat transfer in an infinitesimal quasistatic process. The original poster is examining the relationship between pressure, volume, and temperature for an ideal gas, questioning the absence of the number of moles in their final equation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to differentiate the ideal gas law and manipulate the resulting equations to express heat transfer. They question why their final equation lacks dependence on the number of moles.
  • Some participants suggest that the dimensions of the derived equation do not align with expectations for heat transfer, prompting further examination of the relationships involved.
  • Others raise the possibility of discrepancies in multiple sources discussing the same problem, questioning the validity of the proposed solution.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the equations and questioning the assumptions made in the original poster's derivation. Some guidance has been offered regarding dimensional analysis and the relationship between the derived equations, but no consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential for confusion regarding the definitions of specific heat capacities and the implications of the ideal gas law in the context of the problem. There is also mention of the lack of solutions in external sources, which may contribute to the uncertainty in the discussion.

PeterPoPS
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to show a formula for an ideal gas, but I don't get the right results.

Homework Statement


For an ideal gas PV = nRT where n is the number of momles. Show that the heat transferred in an infinitesimal quasistatic process of an ideal gas can be written as

dQ = \frac{C_V}{nR}VdP + \frac{C_P}{nR}PdV


Homework Equations


<br /> dU = dQ + dW<br />

<br /> C_P = C_V + R<br />

<br /> dU = nC_VdT<br />

<br /> dW = -PdV<br />


The Attempt at a Solution



I differented the formula for the ideal gas PV = nRT so it becomes

PdV + VdP = nRdT

<br /> dT = \frac{PdV + VdP}{nR}<br />

<br /> dU = C_V\frac{PdV + VdP}{R}<br />

<br /> dQ = C_V\frac{PdV + VdP}{R} + PdV = \left(\frac{C_V}{R} + 1\right)PdV + \frac{C_V}{R}VdP = \frac{C_P}{R}PdV + \frac{C_V}{R}VdP<br />

What have I done wrong? There is no dependens on n in my final equation.
I know there should be bars on dW and dQ but i didn't got it to work in latex :/
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
PeterPoPS said:

The Attempt at a Solution



I differented the formula for the ideal gas PV = nRT so it becomes

PdV + VdP = nRdT

<br /> dT = \frac{PdV + VdP}{nR}<br />

<br /> dU = C_V\frac{PdV + VdP}{R}<br />

<br /> dQ = C_V\frac{PdV + VdP}{R} + PdV = \left(\frac{C_V}{R} + 1\right)PdV + \frac{C_V}{R}VdP = \frac{C_P}{R}PdV + \frac{C_V}{R}VdP<br />

What have I done wrong? There is no dependens on n in my final equation.
I know there should be bars on dW and dQ but i didn't got it to work in latex :/
Your answer is correct. The solution posed by the question is wrong. There is no "n" in the denominator. dQ must have the same dimensions as VdP or PdV, which has dimensions of energy. C_v/R is dimensionless.

AM
 
I have just come across the same problem in an exercise book (no solution unfortunately). Its very unlikely two sources are incorrect?
 
phjw said:
I have just come across the same problem in an exercise book (no solution unfortunately). Its very unlikely two sources are incorrect?
How do you know they are two different sources?

The dimensions of the suggested answer are dimensions of energy per mole. If the dQ was the specific heat flow per mole the suggested answer would be correct, which is maybe what the OP was saying.Consider an expansion at constant pressure. By definition:

(1) dQ = nC_pdT

where C_p is the molar heat capacity at constant pressure.

The solution of the OP gives:

(2) dQ = \frac{C_P}{R}PdV

since VdP = 0 (constant pressure).

You can see that (2) is equivalent to (1) if:

nRdT = PdV

This, of course, follows from the ideal gas law for a constant pressure process.

AM
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K