Why Does n=2 Not Produce an Equally Strong Peak in X-ray Diffraction?

thcommj
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
1. In satisfying the Bragg's law, n\lambda=2d\sin\theta, n is typically assumed to be one, which explains why we see only one peak for a particular plane (say [400] plane for silicon). But I really don't see why n=2 should not appear as an equally strong peak..?

2. Is the Fourier transform effect of X-ray scattering comparable to that of a Fraunhoffer diffraction by multiple slits?

3. In calculating the Fourier transform of the original lattice, how is the origin of the r vectors determined? Or it doesn't matter?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(1) Purely according to Bragg's law it should be an equally strong peak. However there is also a matter of the structure factor and atomic scattering factors. See B.D. Cullity chapter 4.

(2) I don't know

(3) It doesn't matter. The lattice vectors describe the translational periodicity of the crystal. Sometimes it is conceptually convenient to define one of the atoms as the origin, but this isn't necessary.
 
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top