Why does refraction of light involve a difference in speed?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Evans of Sprot
  • Start date Start date
Evans of Sprot
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
As I understand it, refraction of light works because of a difference in the speed of light between the two medums involved (Snell's Law?).

However according to the theory of relativity the speed of light is a constant.

These two statements seem incompatible and I would like to know if there is a simple explanation.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The speed of light in vacuum is a constant.
 
In Relativity, it is the speed of light in a vacuum that is constant. Also, in a medium the reason the apparent speed of light is lower is that the light is being absorbed and re-emitted by the atoms of the medium. It is the delay between the absorbtion and emission that seems to "slow" the light down. While the light is traveling from atom to atom it still travels at the constant speed it does in a vacuum.
 
Many thanks to you both!

Very simple really!
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...

Similar threads

Replies
93
Views
5K
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Back
Top