Why Does S(gas) > S(liquid) > S(solid) in Benzene?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between Gibbs free energy and entropy in benzene across its solid, liquid, and gas phases. It highlights that the Gibbs free energy decreases with temperature, with distinct linear segments for each phase. The formula (dG/dT)P = −S is used to demonstrate that the entropy of gas is greater than that of liquid, which in turn is greater than that of solid. Participants express confusion about how to visualize this relationship and suggest using graphs and tangent lines to analyze slopes. The key takeaway is that the increasing slope magnitudes indicate higher entropy in gaseous states compared to liquid and solid states.
subtletuna
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The Gibbs free energy of benzene decreases continuously with temperature (at fixed pressure) and shows three nearly linear segments corresponding to the solid, liquid and gas phases. The magnitude of the slopes increases as one moves from solid to liquid, and liquid to gas.
Use the formula (dG/dT)P = −S to show that S(gas) > S(liquid) > S(solid).

Homework Equations



(dG/dT)_P = −S

The Attempt at a Solution


I have no idea where to begin sadly =\... I made a graph of G vs T, but i don't think that helps much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Draw tangent lines in the solid, liquid, and gas regions. Are the slopes positive or negative, and how do the magnitudes compare?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top