Why does sqrt(24) = 2*sqrt(6)?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter nickadams
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the simplification of square roots, specifically why the equation sqrt(24) = 2*sqrt(6) holds true. Participants explore the underlying principles of simplifying square roots, including the properties of multiplication and square roots, and seek clarification on the reasoning behind these mathematical processes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion about the reasoning behind simplifying square roots and seek an explanation for the process.
  • One participant states that sqrt(24) can be expressed as sqrt(4*6), leading to the conclusion that sqrt(24) = 2*sqrt(6).
  • Another participant reiterates the need for understanding why the property sqrt(ab) = sqrt(a)*sqrt(b) is valid, suggesting that squaring both sides can demonstrate this relationship.
  • Participants discuss the associative property of multiplication as a justification for rearranging factors in the expression (xy)(xy) = x(yx)y.
  • Clarifications are provided regarding the commutative and associative properties of multiplication, emphasizing that the order of multiplication does not affect the result.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the mathematical properties involved in simplifying square roots, but there remains uncertainty about the intuitive understanding of why these properties hold true. The discussion does not reach a consensus on a singular explanation for the reasoning behind the simplification process.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express a lack of understanding regarding specific steps in the mathematical reasoning, indicating that further clarification may be needed on the associative law and its application in this context.

nickadams
Messages
182
Reaction score
0
I realize the process for simplifying square roots is to break it down into lowest factors and then bring the pairs out of the radical, but why does that work? Can anybody offer an explanation?

I know it's a really elementary question but i never understood why it works! :redface:
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
\sqrt{24}=\sqrt{(4)(6)}
Square root of 4? = 2...
2\sqrt{6}=\sqrt{24}
 
iRaid said:
\sqrt{24}=\sqrt{(4)(6)}
Square root of 4? = 2...
2\sqrt{6}=\sqrt{24}

ya i get that, but i don't understand why it works. To me it's just a little trick that works but i don't know why
 
nickadams said:
I realize the process for simplifying square roots is to break it down into lowest factors and then bring the pairs out of the radical, but why does that work? Can anybody offer an explanation?

I know it's a really elementary question but i never understood why it works! :redface:

well, it all hinges on this fact:

for a,b ≥ 0, √(ab) = (√a)(√b).

how can we prove this? well, we can just square (√a)(√b) and see if we wind up with ab.

to do THAT, we need another fact (which is probably easier for you to swallow):

(xy)2 = x2y2

because: (xy)2 = (xy)(xy) = x(yx)y = x(xy)y = (xx)(yy) = x2y2.

so...[(√a)(√b)]2 = (√a)2(√b)2 = ab

(by the definition of square root), and since a,b ≥ 0, √a, √b ≥ 0 (we are only interested in the POSITIVE square root), and positive (to be truly accurate, non-negative) times positive is positive (if one of a,b (or both) is 0, then ab = 0, and the square root of 0 is 0).

therefore, (√a)(√b) is indeed the positive square root of ab.
 
Deveno said:
well, it all hinges on this fact:

for a,b ≥ 0, √(ab) = (√a)(√b).

how can we prove this? well, we can just square (√a)(√b) and see if we wind up with ab.

to do THAT, we need another fact (which is probably easier for you to swallow):

(xy)2 = x2y2

because: (xy)2 = (xy)(xy) = x(yx)y = x(xy)y = (xx)(yy) = x2y2.

so...[(√a)(√b)]2 = (√a)2(√b)2 = ab

(by the definition of square root), and since a,b ≥ 0, √a, √b ≥ 0 (we are only interested in the POSITIVE square root), and positive (to be truly accurate, non-negative) times positive is positive (if one of a,b (or both) is 0, then ab = 0, and the square root of 0 is 0).

therefore, (√a)(√b) is indeed the positive square root of ab.

thanks that was great! But can you explain how you did...

(xy)(xy) = x(yx)y

?

what is that step? I knew (xy)(xy) = x^2y^2 but i don't get your intermediate steps... The rest was crystal clear thank you
 
x(yx)y is just multiplying, you can multiply in any order and you will always get the same number:

Example: 2*3*4*5 = 5*3*4*2 = 4*5*3*2 = etc..
 
square both sides. you get the same thing. then what?
 
iRaid said:
x(yx)y is just multiplying, you can multiply in any order and you will always get the same number:

Example: 2*3*4*5 = 5*3*4*2 = 4*5*3*2 = etc..

oh that's true. Thanks for the help iRaid

mathwonk said:
square both sides. you get the same thing. then what?

24=4*6... so they're equal lol

thanks everyone
 
nickadams said:
thanks that was great! But can you explain how you did...

(xy)(xy) = x(yx)y

?

what is that step? I knew (xy)(xy) = x^2y^2 but i don't get your intermediate steps... The rest was crystal clear thank you

in more complete detail:

(xy)(xy) = ((xy)x)y = (x(yx))y = x(yx)y

the re-positioning of the parentheses is justified by the associative law for multiplication:

for any 3 (real, rational, integer) numbers a,b,c:

(ab)c = a(bc).

associativity is often over-looked as a property of multiplication because we just take it for granted and often write:

abc, for any triple (or longer) product.

so i could have just written:

(xy)2= x*y*x*y = x*x*y*y = x2y2

(where all i did is "switch" the middle two factors, since multiplication for (real, rational, integer) numbers is also commutatitive).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K