Why Does Stirring Sugar into Coffee Change Pitch?

  • Thread starter Thread starter billy_boy_999
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Stirring sugar into coffee raises the pitch of the stirring sound due to changes in the velocity of sound caused by the introduction of bubbles in the liquid. As sugar dissolves, the frequency of the sound increases because the fluid becomes more compressible, resulting in a higher velocity of sound. This phenomenon is also observed when making chocolate milk, where similar effects occur. The presence of bubbles allows sound waves to travel faster, as they perceive the mixture as a continuum rather than being slowed down by the air. Ultimately, the interaction between the bubbles and the liquid alters the acoustic properties, leading to the observed increase in pitch.
billy_boy_999
Messages
131
Reaction score
0
when I'm stirring sugar into my coffee, the tone of the stirring sound gets higher and higher pitched...if you pay attention, it takes a while and it raises a lot but eventually it seems to hit a ceiling...what's going on exactly? I'm guessing that the sugar dissolving is raising the pitch somehow and that the top pitch is correspondent to the sugar being entirely dissolved...but why should that change the pitch of the sound of the stirring? how does it work?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmmm, that happens when I'm making chocolate milk out of hershey's chocolate syrup and milk as well... I've never thought about it though.
 
Here is a thread which discusses this phenomena at some length.
 
The sound you hear comes from standing waves in the cup of coffee, whose frequency depends on the height of the coffe. While you stir this height remains approximately the same while the frequency definitely changes (f=v/\lambda). The only way this can happen is if the velocity of sound is altered.

When you stir there are a lot of small bubblues introduced in the liquid. You might reason that the new velocity of dsound in the coffe will be someweher in between that of the velocity of sound in water and in air. But the cute thing is, because of the bubbles; the fluid is much easier to compress, yielding a larger velocity.

A larger velocity means a larger frequency because of the standing waves condition. This also explains why instant coffee works much better than normal coffee or tea.
 
da_willem said:
When you stir there are a lot of small bubblues introduced in the liquid. You might reason that the new velocity of dsound in the coffe will be someweher in between that of the velocity of sound in water and in air. But the cute thing is, because of the bubbles; the fluid is much easier to compress, yielding a larger velocity.

But wouldn't since there's air in it, the sound travel slower?
 
Mk said:
But wouldn't since there's air in it, the sound travel slower?

No; the wavelength of the sound waves is much larger than the bubble size, so they 'see' the coffee with bubbles as a continuum. So the reasoning: the travels a while trough the coffee, then it slows down in a bubble etc so the velocity most be lower than in pure coffee - does not hold.

The velocity of sound in a liquid is approximately

1/\sqrt{\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial p}}.

And this quantity is actually larger for the mixture with bubbles than in pure coffee. This can be easily seen: \sqrt{\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial p}} is smaller for the mixture because under the influence of pressure the density changes more than it would in pure coffee. This is because air is far easily compressed than water.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top