Why does tape distribute static charge unevenly?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nienstien
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Static
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the uneven distribution of static charge when two pieces of Scotch tape are pulled apart, with one consistently becoming positive and the other negative. This phenomenon raises questions about how identical materials can exhibit such consistent charge differences, despite being governed by the triboelectric series. The adhesive properties of the tape, which involve chemical bonding and Van der Waals forces, are examined as potential factors in this charge separation. The Earth's electric field is also considered, but deemed insufficient to explain the observed effects. Ultimately, the mechanics of tape removal and the speed at which it is pulled may play a significant role in the resulting charge distribution.
Nienstien
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
There's a popular experiment where you get two pieces of Scotch tape and label one top and one bottom. You attach them together on their sticky sides and then pull them apart and they will attract showing that you can get static electricity without friction. Anyhow, when I thought about it I had a couple problems with how this worked out.

How can two like materials distribute charge unevenly? Isn't charge generally governed by the triboelectric series for non-friction events?

Also, the top tape was consistently positive and the bottom tape was consistently negative (Two top tapes from different trials would repel). This rules out a random event such as how the factory applied the adhesive.
I've researched a bit about the adhesive in tape and found that they are either chemically bonding or experiencing dispersive adhesion which involves Van der Walls attraction.

How can adhesives react like this to consistantly provide opposite charges if they are the exact same thing?

This question has been bothering me for a while and I'd like to get to the bottom of it. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
According to descriptions found elsewhere on the web, in this experiment the TOP tape is stuck to the smooth side of the BOTTOM tape, which explains why they acquire different charges and attract one another.
 
I've seen that version too but it works with the sticky sides facing as well which is questioning part. If you have tape you can try it for your self.
 
I wondered if it had anything to do with the Earth's electric field (which is directed downwards). In that case I'd have thought the top tape would become negative and the bottom positive. Anyway, a typical value for the field is 100 volts per metre, which is, I'd have thought, too low to cause enough charge separation for observable attraction. So I think we can rule out this explanation. Pity because it would account for the top/bottom symmetry-breaking.
 
Last edited:
Do you always pull the top tape off of the fixed lower tape.
My guess is that the moving tape will leave electrons behind and be positive.
Also, the speed of removal may affect the magnitude of the charge.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...

Similar threads

Back
Top