Why does the cube root function have a discontinuous derivative at x=0?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter {???}
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Continuity
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the cube root function f(x)=x^{1/3} and its derivative, particularly the nature of the discontinuity at x=0. Participants explore the implications of this discontinuity on the function's smoothness, both mathematically and intuitively, raising questions about definitions of smoothness and the behavior of derivatives.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that the derivative f'(x)=\frac{1}{3}x^{-2/3} has a discontinuity at x=0, despite the graph appearing smooth.
  • Another participant agrees with the initial observation but questions the reasoning regarding the implications for mathematical smoothness.
  • A later reply introduces the idea of rotating the coordinate axes, suggesting that in a new coordinate system, the derivative might be continuous, although this raises questions about the definition of a function.
  • Another participant asserts that the function is not mathematically smooth (not in C^inf) and is only in C^0 or D^1.
  • Further discussion points out that while considering the function as a smooth curve in a coordinate-free sense is valid, it diverges from the standard definition of a function.
  • One participant suggests parameterizing the curve to maintain a function definition while exploring its properties.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of the discontinuous derivative for the smoothness of the function. There is no consensus on whether the cube root function can be considered mathematically smooth, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the definitions and implications of smoothness in this context.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in definitions of smoothness and continuity, particularly in relation to coordinate transformations and the nature of functions. The implications of these transformations on the continuity of derivatives are not fully resolved.

{???}
Messages
57
Reaction score
7
Hey everyone,

I was just curious about the nature of the cube root function f(x)=x^{1/3}. I know that its derivative is obviously \frac{1}{3}x^{-2/3} which has a discontinuity at x=0. However, in the non-mathematical sense, the graph of y=f(x) looks smooth - I don't see any angles or cusps like y=|x| or y=x^{2/3}.

Now, granted, the discontinuity in f'(x) is a vertical asymptote where \delta(M) can always be chosen such that:
|x|<\delta \Rightarrow f'(x)>M
So unlike the asymptotes of \frac{1}{x} for example, or the derivative of y=x^{2/3}, the function both sides of the discontinuity "goes to positive infinity" so the tangent line to x^{1/3} approaches the same slope on either side of x=0.

My question is: Is this a good enough explanation as to why an apparently smooth function has a discontinuous derivative? If not, why doesn't this violate the definition of a (mathematically) smooth function? (This may border on a philosophical question, so my apologies in advance if so)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
{?} said:
My question is: Is this a good enough explanation as to why an apparently smooth function has a discontinuous derivative? If not, why doesn't this violate the definition of a (mathematically) smooth function? (This may border on a philosophical question, so my apologies in advance if so)
Yes to the first, but I don't understand your reasoning in the second. How do you think it would lead to such? Mathematically smooth is very much more demanding than apparently smooth.
 
haruspex said:
Yes to the first, but I don't understand your reasoning in the second. How do you think it would lead to such? Mathematically smooth is very much more demanding than apparently smooth.

My reasoning is best described mathematically as follows (and I admit, rather poorly at that):
Suppose we rotate the coordinate axes by \frac{\pi}{6} (i.e., counterclockwise) and label the new grid (x^*,y^*). We could technically have in this new coordinate system a function y^*=f^*(x) that, although not expressible in terms of elementary functions, describes the graph of y=x^{1/3}.

My claim is that
\frac{\mathrm{d}y^*}{\mathrm{d}x}
is continuous. For other functions with "clearly" discontinuous derivatives, i.e., y_2=|x|, y_3=x^{2/3},\ldots this is not the case.

Just wanted to point this out because it's different from most other piecewise-smooth functions in that respect. Any thoughts?
 
Your question is kind of a non-question - your f(x) is not mathematically smooth, that is, it is not in C^inf. It is only in C^0 or D^1.
 
{?} said:
Suppose we rotate the coordinate axes
OK, so you're thinking of it as a smooth curve in the plane, in more of a co-ordinate free sense.
That's true, but that is rather different from a function. E.g. you could rotate it so that there are multiple y values for some x values, so now it is not even a function in the standard definition.
One way around this is to parameterise, making x and y functions of some other variable that changes monotonically along the curve.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K