Why Does the dy Disappear When Solving Differential Equations?

Physics-Pure
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Hello all~

Given the equation:
dy/dx = (x/y)
I know we would initially go to:
∫dy =∫ (x/y) dx
then too:
∫(y)(dy) = ∫x dx
Until arriving at:
(y2/2) + C1 = (x2/2) + C2
(y2) - (x2) = C

My question is:
Where does the dy disappear to in step 4? Where the anti-derivative is taken.

Why does ∫dy become just y when solving an equation of the form
dy/dx = (x2 + 1), but it disappears in the first example?


Thank you~
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is, basically, wrong all the way.
First off, if you have dy/dx=x/y(x), we may rewrite this, bu multiplying both sides with y(x) as:

y(x)dy/dx=x.

Then, up to an arbitrary constant of integration, we'll have.

int((y(x)dy/dx)dx)=int(xdx).
That is integrating BOTH sides with respect to the same variable, i.e, "x".

Now, on the left-hand side, we use the reverse of the chain rule of differentiation, that is, integration by substitution, letting "y" be our integration variable.
There is no magical disappearance of any variables or infinitesemals.
 
arildno said:
This is, basically, wrong all the way.
First off, if you have dy/dx=x/y(x), we may rewrite this, bu multiplying both sides with y(x) as:

y(x)dy/dx=x.Now, on the left-hand side, we use the reverse of the chain rule of differentiation, that is, integration by substitution, letting "y" be our integration variable.
There is no magical disappearance of any variables or infinitesemals.

Where did that y(x) come from?
And are you saying that we let y = y(x)dy/dx)dx?

P.S. I was simply following the "Introduction to differential equations" video, under calculus. Found here: http://www.hippocampus.org/Calculus & Advanced Math;jsessionid=BAEE0BB1E88F4A594768EEBE4D8FC1EA
 
Why does ∫dy become just y when solving an equation of the form

Following the method presented (which is known as variables separable or separation of variables)

The answer is that ∫dy is not ∫dy it is the ∫1dy.
When you integrate this the integral of 1 is y and the dy drops out as it did in the previous example. You are not integrating the dy.
You asked why the dy drops out - well it is really a book- keeping symbol I see someone else already told you this in another thread.

You should note that the answer to your first question
Where does the dy disappear to in step 4?

is that is disappears to the same place the dx disappears to in the same line and for the same book-keeping reason.
 
There is the following linear Volterra equation of the second kind $$ y(x)+\int_{0}^{x} K(x-s) y(s)\,{\rm d}s = 1 $$ with kernel $$ K(x-s) = 1 - 4 \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \dfrac{1}{\lambda_n^2} e^{-\beta \lambda_n^2 (x-s)} $$ where $y(0)=1$, $\beta>0$ and $\lambda_n$ is the $n$-th positive root of the equation $J_0(x)=0$ (here $n$ is a natural number that numbers these positive roots in the order of increasing their values), $J_0(x)$ is the Bessel function of the first kind of zero order. I...
Are there any good visualization tutorials, written or video, that show graphically how separation of variables works? I particularly have the time-independent Schrodinger Equation in mind. There are hundreds of demonstrations out there which essentially distill to copies of one another. However I am trying to visualize in my mind how this process looks graphically - for example plotting t on one axis and x on the other for f(x,t). I have seen other good visual representations of...
Back
Top