Why Does the Earth Keep Spinning?

  • Thread starter Thread starter neo143
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth Spinning
AI Thread Summary
The Earth continues to spin due to rotational inertia, as explained by Newton's first law, which states that an object in motion stays in motion unless acted upon by an external force. The atmosphere rotates with the planet, and there is no external friction in space to impede this motion. The initial rotation of the Earth originated from the coalescence of matter in a cloud of particles, which conserved angular momentum during its formation. As particles collided and merged, they retained residual tangential motion, leading to the planet's rotation. Understanding these principles clarifies why the Earth maintains its spin without needing an external reason.
neo143
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Why the Earth keeps on spinning?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because it has rotational inertia. :wink: It's just Newton's 1st law applied to the rotational motion of a solid object. (In other words: It doesn't need a reason to keep spinning--that's what things do. But it would need a reason (a torque) to change its spinning.)
 
What about friction due to atmosphere??
 
Atmospheres are part of the planets that they're associated with, and as a basic rule rotate with them. There's nothing in space for the atmosphere to drag against. Winds are 'internal' phenomena of the system, caused by convection, and aren't reflective of the planet's motion.
 
Better the question-What initiated the Earth to be in a state of spinning? Why did Earth start rotating around its axis when it was formed? Can anyone here clear my doubt?
 
The coalescence of matter into a body will conserve the angular momentum of its individual parts. The Earth did not "start rotating", the Earth was a cloud of particles, rocks and gas, in a loose orbit around a cloud of particles rocks and gas that was to become the Sun and the rest of the Solar System. It was already rotating before it formed.


Where does the rotation come from in the first place?

1] Take two particles in empty space.
2] Give them each a random velocity in a random direction.
3] Place them close enough so that they gravitationally interact.
4] When they eventually collide, they will not exactly cancel each others' motion out (There is only a single, astronomically small chance of this happening - it requires both particles to collide with each other in a direct line, with no tangential motion relative to each other i.e. they were on a collision course to begin with). So, when they collide, they will stick together. They will retain any residual tangential motion that doesn't completely cancel out. This effect is cumulative.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top