I Why does the heat capacity of solids drop exponentially at low temperatures?

pangru
Messages
15
Reaction score
2
According to Einstein (or Debay) model of solids, heat capacity drops exponentially at low temperatures:

300px-Escv.png


question is >> why it changes so dramatically at low temperature
that is physical explanation of this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,
Don't understand your question -- in the sense that where you found the picture, there also is a derivation of the expression. With a link to Debye for lowest T
Or do you seek an answer like "degrees of freedom are frozen" at low T ?
 
BvU said:
Or do you seek an answer like "degrees of freedom are frozen" at low T ?
yes, something like that :smile:

at low T, heat capacity is very low >> how this could be explained?
without math :biggrin:
 
pangru said:
yes, something like that :smile:

at low T, heat capacity is very low >> how this could be explained?
without math :biggrin:

BvU just did!

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
BvU just did!

Zz.
do you mean this? >> degrees of freedom are frozen" at low T
OK. .. and that does frozen degrees of freedom means? :D

Imagine you are Einstein, How would explain this to your grandmother? :D
 
pangru said:
do you mean this? >> degrees of freedom are frozen" at low T
OK. .. and that does frozen degrees of freedom means? :D

Imagine you are Einstein, How would explain this to your grandmother? :D

1. If my grandmother asks me that question, then she would have had some basic knowledge to know the figure she showed me in Post #1. In other words, she would have had to know what "heat capacity" is, what "Debye model" is to describe such heat capacity, the statistical derivation of it, and to know what that figure is saying. This means that she is well-equipped to comprehend the answer.

2. My grandmother was also not a lazy woman. She would have used everything at her disposal to figure out what freezing of the degree of freedom have anything to do with the specific heat curve. She was also pretty sharp to know when an answer to her question was already given and not have missed it this badly.

3. https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/if-you-cant-explain-it-to-your-grandmother.765734/

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes Bystander
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top