Why does the horizon area of a black hole never decrease?

M. next
Messages
380
Reaction score
0
Hawking said that the horizon area of a black hole never decreases and illustrated that in his Hawking Are Theorem:

dA/dt ≥ 0

Does anyone know why is it like that. Why doesn't the area decrease?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
M. next said:
Hawking said that the horizon area of a black hole never decreases and illustrated that in his Hawking Are Theorem:

dA/dt ≥ 0

Does anyone know why is it like that. Why doesn't the area decrease?


According to the Second Law of BH Thermodynamics, in any classical process, the area of the event horizon does not decrease

dA\geq 0

nor does the black hole's entropy, S_{bh} (the BH's event horizon area can remain stable in classical mechanics but will increase 1) if mass is added or 2) if spin or charge are reduced). The second law of black hole mechanics can, however, be violated if the quantum effect is taken into account, namely that the area of the event horizon can be reduced via Hawking radiation.


BH thermodynamics-

http://www.fysik.su.se/~narit/bh.pdf pages 9-13

http://edoc.ub.uni-muenchen.de/6024/1/Deeg_Dorothea.pdf pages 11-13
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you a lot for your reply. I now know why does it increase. You are saying if mass is added or if spin or charge is reduced. How was it known? If this is difficult to answer, then I ask why doesn't it decrease? What will happen if you took the other option IF THE AREA DECREASED what will happen? Will this violate something conventional or what do you say?
 
M. next said:
What will happen if you took the other option IF THE AREA DECREASED what will happen? Will this violate something conventional or what do you say?

Hawking proved the area theorem for a classical black hole (i.e., one in which no quantum effects like Hawking radiation are operating) by a geometric argument which requires considerable groundwork to understand. But the gist of it is that the horizon is made up of outgoing light rays that just barely fail to escape to infinity, and the area of the horizon, roughly speaking, counts the "number" of such light rays that make up the horizon, assuming that they don't converge. Since nothing can escape from a classical black hole, the number of the light rays can't decrease; and Hawking's geometric argument showed that they can't converge. Putting those two things together establishes that the horizon area can't decrease.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thank you very much for putting this in a simple way!
 
stevebd1 said:
the BH's event horizon area can remain stable in classical mechanics but will increase 1) if mass is added or 2) if spin or charge are reduced)

Or if spin or charge are *increased*. (The mass of a classical BH can't be reduced, so we don't have to consider that option.)
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Back
Top