Why Does the Milk Jug Stay Put When the Paper is Pulled?

  • Thread starter Thread starter GreatEscapist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inertia
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on why a milk jug remains upright when a sheet of paper is pulled quickly from under it. The primary explanation involves the concept of inertia, which is the tendency of an object to resist changes in motion. While inertia plays a role, the rapid acceleration of the paper also overcomes the friction between the jug and the paper, preventing the jug from toppling. The conversation highlights the importance of both inertia and friction in this scenario, with participants acknowledging the complexity of real-world physics. Ultimately, understanding these principles clarifies why the jug stays put during the experiment.
GreatEscapist
Messages
178
Reaction score
0
Our latest physics assignment was think-about-it-physics, not actual math physics.

Homework Statement


A milk jug sits on top of a sheet of paper. If this sheet of paper is pulled quickly from under the jug, the jug will not topple over. What explains this the best?

A. The jug has a lot of mass
B. The jug does not have a lot of mass
C. The jug has inertia
D. None of the above

Homework Equations



I wish there were equations to use...

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, long story short, my friend and I (Who were supposed to be working on this together) got in a huge argument over if it is C or D. (I'm pretty sure that those were the choices for A and B. The point is, they weren't the answer)

I put down D, because inertia just didn't sound/feel right. It probably is. She pointed out that inertia would hold it there, because inertia is *basically* the tendency of an object to resist changes in motion. So it wouldn't topple. But see, here's the thing- pulling something from beneath WOULD change its inertia. But does pulling it out faster make it so that it doesn't affect inertia?

I say D, because I think it's something else- I just don't know what it is. :-p

PLEEEEASE help me. I know it's easy, but we both over-analyze. Sucks for us.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
GreatEscapist said:
Our latest physics assignment was think-about-it-physics, not actual math physics.

Homework Statement


A milk jug sits on top of a sheet of paper. If this sheet of paper is pulled quickly from under the jug, the jug will not topple over. What explains this the best?

A. The jug has a lot of mass
B. The jug does not have a lot of mass
C. The jug has inertia
D. None of the above


Homework Equations



I wish there were equations to use...



The Attempt at a Solution



Well, long story short, my friend and I (Who were supposed to be working on this together) got in a huge argument over if it is C or D. (I'm pretty sure that those were the choices for A and B. The point is, they weren't the answer)

I put down D, because inertia just didn't sound/feel right. It probably is. She pointed out that inertia would hold it there, because inertia is *basically* the tendency of an object to resist changes in motion. So it wouldn't topple. But see, here's the thing- pulling something from beneath WOULD change its inertia. But does pulling it out faster make it so that it doesn't affect inertia?

I say D, because I think it's something else- I just don't know what it is. :-p

PLEEEEASE help me. I know it's easy, but we both over-analyze. Sucks for us.

THis is actually a little more complicated than it seems. But for an introductory class a short explanation... The jug has mass thus it has inertia. Inertia is the tendency to resist a change in motion (resist accelertion). So the jug "wants" to stay at rest. Removing the paper from underneath does not change the mass or the inertia of the jug.

The thing about this is the paper must be accelerated rapidly. If you just pull at a fairly constant velocity on the jug will stay right on top of the paper, so friction between the jug and the paper plays a role also. If you pull rapidly on the paper, then you "overcome" the force of friction which has the tendency to make the paper and jug stay together. Pulling the paper rapidly, again, has nothing to do with the inertia of the jug.

Maybe saying that there is an insignificant amount of friction between the jug and the paper would help the problem seem clearer. Trying this experiment with nice smooth silk v. gritty sandpaper, instead of paper, would show you that friction plays an important role.
 
GAH! I was wrong. I hate that- so much.

Well, It did sort of make sense before when she said it was inertia. But that makes even more sense now.
 
Well it gets a bit more sticky also.

If the milk jug did topple it would be because of the torque exerted by the friction between the milk and the paper. It would cause the jug to actually begin to rotate. Once the jug rotated enough that its center of mass was not above the contact surface between the jug and the paper, it would topple due to gravity.

And then of course the center of mass changes as you pull the paper out as we have a liquid in the container. All these things are a bit messy in the real world so we try to make them simple situations by putting in what sometimes are unrealistic parameters to make sure we get rid of a lot of pesky variables.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Back
Top