Why Does the Moment of Inertia of a Rod Equal ML^2/12?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the moment of inertia of a rod about an axis through its center, demonstrating that it equals ML^2/12. The integral approach involves calculating the moment of inertia using the formula ∫r^2dm, with specific limits from -L/2 to L/2. Participants clarify the relationship between mass density (rho), mass (M), and length (L) to eliminate rho from the equations. The integration leads to the conclusion that the moment of inertia simplifies to ML^2/12. This derivation confirms the theoretical result sought in the homework statement.
pchalla90
Messages
55
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that the rotational inertia of the rod about an axis through its center and perpendicular to its length is ML^2/12, where M is Mass and L is length from axis of rotation.


Homework Equations


∫r^2dm=Mr^2


The Attempt at a Solution



Well, you see the integral that I did in the relevant equations? I got most of the work done there, assuming that R=L. My problem is understanding where the /12 comes from in the question. There were no numbers given in the initial question, just M and L.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Great. dm should have a dr in it. What's R? What are the limits on your integral? Take rho to be the density of the rod per unit length. What's M in terms of rho and L? What's the moment of inertia in terms of rho and L? Now eliminate rho.
 
well, dm=pdL is what I am assuming...

so ∫dm=∫pdL
M=pL

but shouldn't the right side of the above equation be a definite integral while the left is an indefinite integral?

i think the right side of the above equation should go from -L/2 to L/2, but that raises the question of the limits of the left side of the equation...

either way, assuming both sides are indefinite integrals, substituting pL for M in ML^2 gives me

pL^3=I

but that's as much as i think i understood of your post.

thanks for the quick reply.
 
Now you want to integrate r^2*rho*dr for r from -L/2 to +L/2 to get the moment of inertia. Then use M=rho*L to get rid of the rho.
 
Okay, so...

∫(-L/2,L/2) pR^2dr= (1/3)R^3p|(-L/2,L/2)
=(1/3)(L/2)^3p-(1/3)(-L/2)^3p
=(1/3)(L/2)^3p+(1/3)(L/2)^3p
=(2/3)(L^3/8)p
=L^3/12p

p=M/L

=(L^3/12)(M/L)
=ML^2/12


Thank you so much for your help.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top