Why Does the Phase Shift in the Sunrise Equation Equal 10 Days?

davedave
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
At Estevan, Saskatchewan, the latest sunrise time is at 9:12am on Dec 21. The earliest sunrise time is 3:12pm on June 21. Sunrise times on other dates can be predicted from a sinusoidal equation. There is no daylight saving time in Saskatchewan and the period is 365 days. Convert the time into minutes and the date into days. That is, June 21 is 172 days and Dec 21 is 355.

The equation is given by

D=180cos(2*pi*(t-10)/365)+372

where D=days and t=time

Does anyone know why the phase shift is equal to 10?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Strictly speaking, the phase shift is 20pi/365. But the "10" is there because t represents the day of the year starting at Jan.1 and the base information, latest and earliest sunrises, is at Dec. 21 and June 21, 10 days earlier than the beginning and middle of the calendar year.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top