Why does the + sign move to O in the addition of alkene with water?

AI Thread Summary
In the addition of water to an alkene, the carbon atom becomes electron deficient, leading to the formation of a carbocation. When water donates a lone pair to the carbon, the oxygen atom becomes electron deficient as it loses one of its lone pairs, resulting in a positive formal charge on the oxygen. Understanding formal charge calculations is crucial for accurately tracking electron distribution in organic chemistry. While memorization of patterns can be helpful, grasping the underlying principles is emphasized for deeper comprehension. This discussion highlights the importance of formal charge in understanding molecular interactions during reactions.
kelvin macks
Messages
60
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



my question is at part 2 , since c form ch3ch2 is electron deficient, but after OH2 added in , with lone pair electron on O, the c should be no longer electron deficient anymore. am i right? why the + sign is moved to O now?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • IMG_20140603_081720[1].jpg
    IMG_20140603_081720[1].jpg
    38.6 KB · Views: 533
Physics news on Phys.org
Please calculate the formal charge on oxygen. Remember that H2O has two lone electron pairs.
 
ChiralWaltz said:
Please calculate the formal charge on oxygen. Remember that H2O has two lone electron pairs.

do u mean now the O become electron deficient, since one lone pair of lectron is donated to C+, and now there's one lone pair left one the O atom?
 
Why is oxygen electron deficient at this point? How many valence electrons should it have to be neutral? How many to be positive? How many to be negative? Do all atoms have the same requirements for their valence shells?

Hint: this deals with the calculation of its Formal Charge…
 
kelvin macks said:
do u mean now the O become electron deficient, since one lone pair of lectron is donated to C+, and now there's one lone pair left one the O atom?

That is not what I said but it is another, less formal, way of looking at the same thing. Knowing how to calculate formal charges is good because books and people can make mistakes. Keeping track of your electrons is incredibly important in O Chem. Once you have seen an oxygen with three sigma bonds and a lone electron pair 100 times, you probably won't need to run the formal charge calculations because you know it is positive.

I prefer to know why rather than rely on memorizing though. The memorization is simply a byproduct.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top