Why does the solution for t in the equation Vf=Vi+at result in a negative sign?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving the equation Vf = Vi + at for time (t) and the confusion surrounding the appearance of a negative sign in the solution t = -Vf/a. The user notes that when Vi is set to zero, the equation simplifies to t = Vf/a, which does not include a negative sign. They reference a source that seemingly introduces the negative sign, leading to uncertainty about its validity. Ultimately, the user concludes that the negative sign may have been a typographical error, as it does not appear in the final answer provided. This highlights the importance of careful examination of equations in physics to avoid misinterpretations.
vysero
Messages
134
Reaction score
0
Ok so here is my problem:

Vf=Vi+at

I want to solve for t so:

(Vf-Vi)/a = t

right so now my problem starts how can this happen:

t = -Vf/a ?

The solution above comes from this site http://www.monmsci.net/~fasano/phys1/Chapter_2_10.pdf

scroll down to problem 2.31 and you will find what I am looking at, in this situation Vi = 0 so they disregarded it and somehow during that process (at least i believe it was during that process) they came up with:

t = -Vf/a

Please explain to me how that works, where the heck did the - sign come from??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
looks like a typo to me. sometimes in gravity problems +v means its going up vs -v means its falling but that's not the case. notice in the actual answer the - is gone.
 
Oh well I didn't even see that lol well thank you it prob. was just a typo
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top