Why does the stone stop before reaching the surface at the other end?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bjarne
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relativistic
Bjarne
Messages
344
Reaction score
0
Imaging a hole the whole way through the Earth, and we will drop a stone into the hole. Imaging there were no resistances at all.

Now the stone would reach the opposite at the Earth and speed here would be exactly zero at the surface at the other end..

Now we will repeat the experiment but this time “Relativistic Resistances” would still count.

It requires more and more energy to get a diminishing increase in speed. – This means that when the stone would reach the center it would not have achieved that speed it is necessary to escape to the surface at the opposite end.

So the stone would now stop before reaching the surface at the other end. (?)
Is that false or correct?

If it is false, - why ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bjarne said:
Imaging a hole the whole way through the Earth, and we will drop a stone into the hole. Imaging there were no resistances at all.

Now the stone would reach the opposite at the Earth and speed here would be exactly zero at the surface at the other end..

Now we will repeat the experiment but this time “Relativistic Resistances” would still count.

It requires more and more energy to get a diminishing increase in speed. – This means that when the stone would reach the center it would not have achieved that speed it is necessary to escape to the surface at the opposite end.

So the stone would now stop before reaching the surface at the other end. (?)
Is that false or correct?

If it is false, - why ?

The red part. It seems you are trying to use relativistic mechanics for the descent but then argue classically about the ascent based on speed. You assume that the "speed necessary to escape to the surface" would be the same in classic or relativistic mechanics.

No matter if classic or relativistic mechanics: The stone converted all potential energy from surface to center into kinetical energy, so it can convert it back to get to the same height. But the speed it has with maximal kinetical energy might be different.

You can also treat the problem geometrically. Since the space time curvature is symmetric, the stone will arrive at the same opposite height. The space time curvature for this case is visualized here:

http://www.adamtoons.de/physics/gravitation.swf

Set initial position to -1 or 1 and initial velocity to 0 for a drop from the surface. As you see the object swings between the surfaces, simply by following a geodesic path in curved space time.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top