Why does the thunder from lighting last much longer than the flash?

AI Thread Summary
The flash from lightning is extremely brief, lasting only a fraction of a second, while the sound of thunder can last 5-6 seconds due to the nature of sound propagation. The length of a lightning bolt, which can span miles, means that sound takes longer to reach an observer from different points along the bolt. Additionally, echoes from surrounding landscapes can prolong the sound of thunder, creating multiple paths for the sound waves. The combination of these factors explains why thunder lasts significantly longer than the flash of lightning. Understanding these principles enhances the appreciation of thunderstorms and their dynamics.
cantgetaname
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
I was walking home today when I noticed that the flash from a lighting takes a fraction of a second while the sound lasts a good 5-6 seconds.
I couldn't think of an explanation for this, except a wild guess that maybe the source of sound is a line source and sound from different points on the lightning bolt takes different times to reach the observer.
 
Science news on Phys.org
That's most of the answer. Lightning bolts can be miles long. Sound in air needs several seconds to travel a miles-longer path. Another answer depending on your surroundings is the presence of echoes, which create additional paths.
 
Here is a video of an unusual (for southern California) thunderstorm. There are a few instances where you see the flash and hear the thunder. At this particular location, echoes from nearby hills add to the sound.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=46yPXf2DwXc
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
98
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Back
Top