Why Does the Toy Truck Stop at 3.2m Instead of 3.5m?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alex_
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a physics problem involving a toy truck rolling up a ramp, where the user is trying to determine why the truck stops at 3.2 meters instead of 3.5 meters. The user initially calculates the distance using energy conservation principles but struggles to account for friction correctly. Participants suggest using the theorem of variation of kinetic energy and emphasize the need to include the work done by friction in the calculations. A key point is the correct relationship between height and distance on the ramp, which is crucial for accurate results. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the importance of careful calculation and consideration of all forces acting on the system.
Alex_
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I can't get this problem and wanted to see if anyone could help me out:

A toy truck has a velocity of 6.0 m/s when it begins to role freely up a ramp inclined at 30.0 degrees. They toy has a mass of 5.0 kg, and the frictional forces present are 4.0N. What distance does the truck travel before stopping?

I keep on getting 3.5m but the correct answer is 3.2m. Anyone know how to solve this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How about using the theorem of variation of KE...?I don't know if you have,but i found this to be the most elegant way

Daniel.
 
Well I've never heard of that theorem before, but maybe I've used it though. What I tried to do to solve this problem is figure out total energy before (Et = Ek + Ep) and then solve for when Ek is 0 after the toy has rolled up the ramp. The thing that complicates this is there's friction involved(heat, F * d). So I'm not sure how I have to include friction into this problem in order to get the right answer.
 
Set the initial energy (purely KE, if you measure PE from the bottom of the ramp) equal to the final energy (PE + the heat due to friction = PE + F*d):
{KE}_i = {PE}_f + F*d
 
For the record the theorem (proven in an elementary version by G.W.Leibniz) states that the variation of KE for a mechanical system is equal to the total work done by external forces acting on the system.In your case,the forces are friction & gravity and the mechanical system is composed only of one particle/body.

Daniel.
 
Doc Al said:
Set the initial energy (purely KE, if you measure PE from the bottom of the ramp) equal to the final energy (PE + the heat due to friction = PE + F*d):
{KE}_i = {PE}_f + F*d

I tried to do that, but got 3.5 as my answer, so I was off by a little bit. I'll show you how I did this problem in deatil, maybe you'll be able to catch any mistakes?

Et_i = Ek_i
Ek_i = 0.5 * 5 * 6^2
Ek_i = 90

Et_f = Ep_f + (F * d)
90 = -5 * -9.81 * h + (4 * (sin30/h))
h = 1.75 (approx.)

sin30 = 1.75/x
x = 3.5 (approx.)
 
The work done by friction is negative as well.Like the one performed by gravity.The length is approximately
x\sim \frac{180}{57}m\sim 3.2 m

Check your calculations again.

Daniel.
 
Alex_ said:
Et_f = Ep_f + (F * d)
90 = -5 * -9.81 * h + (4 * (sin30/h))
h = 1.75 (approx.)
Redo this calculation. x = h/sin30; you have it reversed.
 
Doc Al said:
Redo this calculation. x = h/sin30; you have it reversed.

I tried that and ended up getting 4.38, so that doesn't work either.
 
  • #10
dextercioby said:
The work done by friction is negative as well.Like the one performed by gravity.The length is approximately
x\sim \frac{180}{57}m\sim 3.2 m

Check your calculations again.

Daniel.

where did you get the 180 over 57 from?
 
  • #11
Alex_ said:
I tried that and ended up getting 4.38, so that doesn't work either.
Well, try it again. You are making an arithmetic mistake:
90 = (5)(9.8)h + (4)[2h] = 57h
=> h = ?
 
Back
Top