Why Does Theoretical Pressure Exceed Empirical Values in Hail Cannon Designs?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the discrepancies between theoretical and empirical pressure values in hail cannon designs. The user has created a hail cannon and is struggling to reconcile the higher theoretical pressures calculated using Bernoulli's equation with the lower empirical pressures observed during tests. Factors complicating the calculations include rapid gas expansion, inconsistencies in hail ball shape, and potential air leakage. The user expresses doubt about the feasibility of accurately modeling the system due to numerous variables and assumptions. Overall, the conversation highlights the challenges of applying fluid dynamics principles to a complex projectile system like a hail cannon.
mpm
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
This isn't a homework question; however, it is probably similar to one.

I am doing a design project that involves a hail cannon. Basically I have created an air gun that propels ice balls.

I have a compressed air tank, with an electronic quick release valve and then a barrel made of PVC.

My question is this,

I have tested the gun with different size hail. I have a chronograph to measure velocity, and I have a pressure gauge in the air tank. We tested different air pressures until we found one that resulted in a particular velocity. (In this case its the terminal velocity of falling hail.)

Anyway, I now have to calculate what these pressures should be theoretically. I've tried using Bernoulli's equation with little luck. I get answers but the theoretical pressures come out higher than the empirical pressures. Obvsiously this is impossible, so either I'm doing it wrong or I'm not seeing the over all picture.

Can anyone give me some suggestions on what equation I can use or maybe where to start.

For the record, empirically we have 6.5psi shoots .5" diameter hail at a velocity we want. When doing it theoretically, the same diameter hail shoots the same velocity at 9.5 psi.

Hence the reason why I think I am going wrong somewhere.

Any help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is not my area of expertise but from what I remember Bernoulli's equation gives the velocity of the fluid that is flowing not the object it may be pushing. In this case I would recommend using Force= pressure x area and work out the impulse on the hale that you are firing. Impulse is the change in momentum of a particle caused by the force, so I guess you know how long the jet of air acts upon the hail and you'd have an equation something like.

P x A x T = m x v

Where T is the time the force is acting m is the mass and A is the area its acting upon. Anyway like i say this is not my area of expertise but maybe posting first might get the ball rolling on more replies.

Good luck!
 
I actually have experience with a large compressed air gun, shooting hail balls at jet engines.

The situation is rather complex for a few reasons. First, you are dealing with a rapid expansion of the gas. It is hardly steady state and incompressible and good luck finding a streamline, which throws Bernoulli right out the widow. Secondly, you are expanding across a time varying orifice (your valve). Next, you have the inconsistancies of your hail ball and the leakage of the compressed air around the hail ball. Also, unless you have a high speed camera, chances are you are deforming your hail balls during the shot, so you can't rely on the idea of having a sphere or whatever shape you started with.

Honestly, I think that your 9.5 psi guess isn't too bad considering what you have to deal with. I know the percentage difference sucks, but this is not an easy thing to solve. There are a lot of variables involved.

Perhaps if Clausius or Brewnog see this thread they will comment as well.
 
So am I to assume that the pressure needed to propel the ice a certain velocity cannot be solved theoretically without taking a long time to do?

My professor wants me to do it, but I don't know if it can be done. I have talked to 2 other professors who haven't lead me in the right direction yet. I'm starting to think it can't be modeled because of so many assumptions and variables.

At least in my opinion, if it can be modeled, I don't see how it can be that accurate.

I used P-Po = 1/2*rho*V^2

However, I think I am wrong because I used the density of ice and the velocity it needs to travel. This is part of Bernoulli's equation and that is for fluid flow. Ice obviously isn't a fluid so I think this would be wrong to use. Also when I graph several velocities, the graph is way off.

Any more help would be appreciated.
 
What is your terminal velocity for the hail?
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top