Why Does Thermal Conductivity Disparity Matter in Real-World Scenarios?

AI Thread Summary
Thermal conductivity disparities among materials like glass, plastic, and metal affect heat loss, but real-world scenarios show minimal differences in temperature drop rates. While metal has higher thermal conductivity, the heat loss occurs through both the walls and surface of the cups, with natural convection playing a significant role in heat transfer. Natural convection is slower and tends to equalize the temperature drop across different materials. Additionally, all cups radiate energy, contributing to heat loss. Overall, the experimental conditions may not be sufficient to observe significant differences in thermal behavior among the materials.
sasuke07
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I was wondering why there is such a disparity between thermal conductivty and how they act in the real world.
Ex. If if have 3 cups filled with hot water. The 3 cups are made of glass, plastic and metal.
The metal will obviously have way higher thermal conductivity compared to the glass and plastic cups. But the temp. goes down slowly in all 3 cups and the rate that the temp. goes down. between the 3 cups are similar. The metal will drop in temp. faster than the other 2 but not that much faster. I was wondering why


Homework Equations



No Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Said in 1.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A cup loses heat through its walls as well as from its surface. Furthermore, in order for the sides to lose heat, the heat must be released via natural convection. Natural convection from horizontal surfaces is greater than it is from vertical surfaces (side of container). Natural convection is a relatively slow mover of heat so it tends to blunt the differences in thermal conductivities of the walls of the cup. What diffuses through the wall must be released to the surrounding air.

The cups also radiate energy. That must be a consideration as well. Water radiates.
 
Rates are similar in them but not equal. Probably your experiment and ambient is too small to judge any significant difference due to the nature of the matters. Rest is clarified by LawrenceC
 
Thanks a lot
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top