A Why does this amplitude not vanish by the Ward identity?

weningth
Messages
4
Reaction score
2
TL;DR Summary
An electron emits a photon. The amplitude for this process is calculated and then the polarisation sum for the photon is performed. However, the terms proportional to the unphysical polarisations do not vanish. Why is that?
Consider the process e^-\rightarrow e^-\gamma depicted in the following Feynman diagram.

amp_q-qg.png


The spin-averaged amplitude with linearly polarised photons is
\overline{|M|^2}=8\pi\alpha\left(-g^{\mu\nu}+\epsilon^\mu_+\epsilon^\nu_-+\epsilon^\mu_-\epsilon^\nu_+\right)\left(p_\mu p^\prime_\nu+p_\nu p^\prime_\mu-g_{\mu\nu}pp^\prime\right),
where the polarisation sum for massless vector bosons was used in terms of the unphysical polarisation vectors \epsilon_\pm=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left(\epsilon_t\pm\epsilon_L\right), \epsilon_t=(1,\mathbf{0}), \epsilon_L=\frac{1}{|\mathbf{k}|}(0,\mathbf{k}).

Now, by the Ward identity the parts of the amplitude of the form \epsilon^\mu_\pm M_\mu should vanish since \epsilon_+\parallel k. However, since \epsilon_+\epsilon_-=1 I find that instead
$$\overline{|M|^2}=16\pi\alpha\left(\epsilon^\mu_+p\epsilon^\nu_-p^\prime+\epsilon^\mu_-p\epsilon^\nu_+p^\prime\right).$$

I know that in general the Ward identity does not hold for individual diagrams but only for the sum of all relevant ones. However, the above diagram is the only one to this order in \alpha.

Why does the term \left(\epsilon^\mu_+\epsilon^\nu_-+\epsilon^\mu_-\epsilon^\nu_+\right)\left(p_\mu p^\prime_\nu+p_\nu p^\prime_\mu-g_{\mu\nu}pp^\prime\right) not vanish?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your diagram is unphysical as a standalone diagram as it violates unitarity. This is being hinted by the condition that Ward identity as an operation of Polarization vector on amplitude does not vanish. Since there are no other diagrams at level \alpha, you can not consider this diagram with both lines as external lines.

You can however add an external potential to the diagram to make it unitary and the process will be similar to Bremmstrahlung.
 
  • Like
Likes weningth and vanhees71
Great answer! Thanks.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top