Why Does This Infinite Product Identity Hold for Integer Partitions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter futurebird
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Infinite Product
futurebird
Messages
270
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am reading about integer partitions. I'm learning a proof and I don't understand what would seem to be a simple step... as the book presents it without comment:

\prod_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1-q^{2n}}{1-q^{n}}=\prod_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{1-q^{2n-1}}

The fractions presented are not algebraically equivalent outside of the infinite product... So, it's something about the product that makes this possible. I also know that |q|<1... What is going on?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Look at a partial product:

\left(\frac{1-q^2}{1-q}\right)\left(\frac{1-q^4}{1-q^2}\right)\left(\frac{1-q^6}{1-q^3}\right)\left(\frac{1-q^8}{1-q^4}\right)...

At least intuitively, each factor in the numerator is canceled by the corresponding factor in the denominator with q to that same even exponent. So in the limit you are left with 1 on top and odd powers of q in the factors on the bottom.
 
Thank you so much... I wish I'd seen that, it makes so much sense.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top