Why does Toricelli's Principle result in an exponential function for h vs. t?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Muzly
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Principle
Muzly
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
OK - I'm working on Toricelli's Principle at the moment. That is, a tank where there's a small hole at the bottom and we're supposed to plot h (height) vs. t (time), V_jet vs. t, mass flow rate vs. t, and change in height vs. t.

Now - I get a linear graph for V_jet and mass flow rate vs. time, but a non-linear curve for h and mass in the tank vs time. And I can't prove it.

We're neglecting any internal energy transfers, etc. just plain old V = Sqrt(2.g.h)

Any help muchly appreciated.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If "mass flow rate" vs time is linear, rate= kt, then mass moved out of the tank will be quadratice in time: (1/2)kt2; so of course, the mass in the tank will be quadratic.
 
Let mass vs t is v(kg/min) so : h' =-A*v( A is a constant)
And we can see that v is linearly propotional to h or v=B*h
then combine the two we have:
h'=-C*h
Solve this differential equation, we have the function h=D*exp(-k.t). So h=f(t) is not a quadratic, it's an exponential.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top