Why doesn't an AC voltage converter work for DC?

AI Thread Summary
An AC voltage converter cannot effectively work with DC because a transformer relies on changing magnetic fields to induce voltage, which does not occur with constant DC. When DC is applied, the transformer core quickly reaches magnetic saturation, preventing further induction and leading to overheating. While theoretically possible to use DC with a transformer, practical applications require alternating or pulsed current to maintain output. Modern techniques like switch-mode power supplies can convert DC voltages by chopping the current, effectively creating an AC-like signal for transformation. Understanding these principles clarifies why transformers are incompatible with steady DC.
Strangeline
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
I understand the difference between AC and DC, and i also understand how an AC transformer works... but I guess not completely. My question is why can't a DC use its emf to create a lower voltage current like AC can?

Does the DC's emf accrue over time thus making its transformation short lived? If so, i have no idea how that works, since i think the DC's emf should be constant as long as the voltage/current is constant.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi Strangeline! Welcome to PF! :wink:
Strangeline said:
Does the DC's emf accrue over time thus making its transformation short lived? If so, i have no idea how that works, since i think the DC's emf should be constant as long as the voltage/current is constant.

Yes, you're right. :smile:

A transformer does work with direct current, but the core very quickly reaches saturation (ie, all the little magnetic domains are lined up with the applied field), so the magnetic flux stays constant, and there's no more induction.

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transformer#Effect_of_frequency"
The time-derivative term in Faraday's Law shows that the flux in the core is the integral with respect to time of the applied voltage.[36] Hypothetically an ideal transformer would work with direct-current excitation, with the core flux increasing linearly with time.[37] In practice, the flux would rise to the point where magnetic saturation of the core occurs, causing a huge increase in the magnetizing current and overheating the transformer. All practical transformers must therefore operate with alternating (or pulsed) current.[37]​

and also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturation_(magnetic)#Introduction"
Different materials have different saturation levels. For example, high permeability iron alloys used in transformers reach magnetic saturation at 1.6 - 2.2 teslas (T), whereas ferrites saturate at 0.2 - 0.5 T. Some amorphous alloys saturate at 1.2-1.3 T. …​
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What comes out of a transformer depends on the input volts changing constantly so DC no good if you want a sustained output..

It is pretty easy to change DC voltages up and down nowadays, using 'switch-mode' techniques. This always involves 'chopping' the DC in some way, though, so you are, in effect, making your own AC in the conversion box.
 
Great! thanks for clearing it up, this was driving me crazy
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top