Why doesn't dark matter clump together?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mrspeedybob
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dark matter Matter
AI Thread Summary
Dark matter does not clump together due to the negligible gravitational attraction between individual particles, which limits momentum exchange and prevents significant clumping on smaller scales. While interactions can redistribute momentum, the effect is minimal, allowing only for clumping at the scale of galaxies rather than smaller, dense bodies. Cosmic expansion further complicates this by creating an imbalance in energy exchange between incoming and outgoing particles. As a result, the average momentum and temperature of dark matter clouds remain stable, ruling out the formation of small, dense, non-luminous bodies as dark matter candidates. The dynamics of dark matter behavior continue to be a complex area of study in astrophysics.
mrspeedybob
Messages
869
Reaction score
65
I understand there are no friction forces to slow it down but there are other means of dissipating kinetic energy.

Every time 2 dark matter particles come close enough to interact gravitationally there should be some exchange of momentum. If there is a cloud of dark matter particles, such as in and around a galaxy, there would be constant re-distribution of momentum. Each time a particle acquires enough momentum to escape the cloud the average momentum of the particles in the cloud is reduced. This would be a sort of evaporation that continually lowers the average temperature of the cloud. Cosmic expansion would create a difference between the amount of energy gained from incoming particles and that lost with outgoing particles. The result of all this should be small, dense, bodies of dark matter.

I understand that small, dense, non-luminous bodies have been ruled out as dark matter candidates. What prevents dark matter from behaving as I have suggested?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Every time 2 dark matter particles come close enough to interact gravitationally there should be some exchange of momentum.
Sure, but that momentum exchange is tiny. Gravitational attraction between individual particles is almost negligible. It is sufficient to give clumping on the scale of galaxies (where you have many particles interacting at the same time), but not on smaller scales within the current lifetime of the universe.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top