Why doesn't direct current work in a transformer circuit?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kuzey Cem
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit
AI Thread Summary
Direct current (DC) does not work in a transformer circuit because it does not produce a changing magnetic field, which is essential for inducing current in the secondary coil. When DC is first applied, it creates a changing magnetic field that can induce an initial current, but as the current stabilizes, the magnetic field becomes constant, resulting in no further induced current. This lack of change leads to the transformer core potentially saturating and generating heat without transferring power. While some devices labeled as AC/DC transformers are used for high voltage DC applications, they actually function as DC/DC converters rather than traditional transformers. Understanding these principles is crucial for effectively utilizing transformers and converters in electrical applications.
Kuzey Cem
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I recently learned that if you send direct current through the primary coil of a transformer, no power would be transferred to the secondary circuit? Why is that?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Can you tell us why it works for AC? If so, then you should know why it does not work for DC.
 
Theoretically, it would work. Since the flux in the core of the transformer increases by the integral of the applied voltage (Faraday's law), in an ideal transformer, the flux would just continue to increase. However, if you tried this with an actual transformer, you would drive the core into saturation and create a lot of heat.

Dr. Frank Ferrese
 
  • Like
Likes OliskaP
A Straight Answer:
A changing current produces a changing magnetic field, which in turn can induce a current in the secondary. If the current is not changing, the magnetic field is not changing, so no current is induced in the secondary.

When you first apply a DC voltage the current ramps up, so the field is changing and an initial current is induced in the secondary. But when the current stops changing (limited by resistance, for example) there will be no current induced into the secondary.
 
Picture time. :approve:

transf.gif


http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/transf.html
 
  • Like
Likes jim hardy and berkeman
I don't know why but i have read on other sources that people use ac/dc transformers on high voltage dc applications of 60v or more. they used the simple wall-warts to convert the high dc voltage to lower dc voltage.
however even then, they still said that some wall-warts worked and some didnt.
Dont know why that works with higher DC voltages but know it does. sometimes!

check out this link: people on that forum use them a lot.
https://endless-sphere.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=75171&p=1135736&hilit=wall+warts#p1135736
 
Referring to the picture, if most of the magnetic flux stays inside the iron core, how do moving field lines cut through the secondary coil?
 
I recently learned that if you send direct current through the primary coil of a transformer, no power would be transferred to the secondary circuit? Why is that?

The inductor has 0ohm resistance at dc
 
  • Like
Likes NascentOxygen
  • #10
SDRFG said:
The inductor has 0ohm resistance at dc

no, that is incorrect. There will be resistance and is easily measured with an Ohm meter
for a transformer primary, it can easily be several 100 to several 1000 Ohms
 
Last edited:
  • #11
David Lewis said:
Referring to the picture, if most of the magnetic flux stays inside the iron core, how do moving field lines cut through the secondary coil?
The field lines do not have to be moving. The changing magnitude and direction (+/-) of the primary current generates a changing flux value, which in turn induces the changing secondary output voltage.
 
  • #12
If the flux value (concentration of field lines) changes, do the magnetic field lines move?
 
  • #13
David Lewis said:
If the flux value (concentration of field lines) changes, do the magnetic field lines move?

It's a quirk of the universe that the "lines" need not "cut" the conductors,
only that they be encircled by the conductors.

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faraday's_law_of_induction and http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/farlaw.html

The field itself is more of a continuous fluid than discrete lines. It goes everywhere , just changes its intensity as you get farther from its source.
But drawing lines helps us visualize it and gives us something we can count to gauge its intensity.

A "line" is a called Maxwell, one of them per square centimeter is called a Gauss which is roughly the magnetic field strength of Earth that tugs your compass needle around.
A field strength of ten thousand Gauss is called a Tesla, about the field strength of a good loudspeaker magnet.

Any help ?

old jim
 
  • Like
Likes Tom.G, berkeman and David Lewis
  • #14
Many thanks, Jim. I posed a difficult question that has been puzzling me for a while. Good answer.
 
  • Like
Likes jim hardy
  • #15
Thanks for the feedback !
 
Back
Top