Why Doesn't Right Hand Rule #2 Work for This Capacitor's Electric Field?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the confusion regarding the application of the right-hand rule in determining the direction of current in a circuit involving a parallel plate capacitor and a decreasing magnetic field. Participants clarify that Lenz's law indicates the induced magnetic field must counteract the decrease in flux, leading to an induced current that flows in a specific direction. The right-hand rule's application is debated, with emphasis on correctly identifying the roles of the thumb and fingers based on the geometry of the current and magnetic field. Ultimately, the correct interpretation is that the thumb represents the direction of the current in a straight wire, while the fingers indicate the magnetic field's direction. The conversation concludes with a participant expressing gratitude for the clarification.
michaelw
Messages
80
Reaction score
0
Indicate the direction of the electric field between the plates of the parallel plate capacitor shown in the drawing if the magnetic field is decreasing in time. Give your reasoning

if the magnetic field is decreasing, so is the flux, so mr. lenz says the induced magnetic field must be out of the page to counteract the decreasing flux

but with right hand rule #2, it completely depends where you put your hand in determining the direction of current

if you put it at the top of the the wire, curl fingers out of page, current goes to the right (right hand, conventional current).. ie) clockwise

if you put it at the bottom, current still goes to the right, but now it means the direction is counter clockwise.

which is right and why?? :confused: :confused:
 

Attachments

  • nw1017-n.gif
    nw1017-n.gif
    1.5 KB · Views: 672
Physics news on Phys.org
michaelw said:
Indicate the direction of the electric field between the plates of the parallel plate capacitor shown in the drawing if the magnetic field is decreasing in time. Give your reasoning

if the magnetic field is decreasing, so is the flux, so mr. lenz says the induced magnetic field must be out of the page to counteract the decreasing flux

but with right hand rule #2, it completely depends where you put your hand in determining the direction of current

if you put it at the top of the the wire, curl fingers out of page, current goes to the right (right hand, conventional current).. ie) clockwise

if you put it at the bottom, current still goes to the right, but now it means the direction is counter clockwise.

which is right and why?? :confused: :confused:

Eh?

I'm confused too... but not with the right hand rule, but rather what you described. What do "put it at the top of the wire" and "put it at the bottom" mean?

Since the B field is decreasing, Lenz's law, as you have correctly stated, will try to preserve the original B field, and thus, will induce a current in the LOOP in the same direction as the original B field. Thus, it will produce an induced B field pointing OUT of the page. So far, we have that in agreement.

Now, use your right hand, and point your thumb in that direction. The way the rest of your fingers curl is the direction of the induced current. PERIOD.

So the current in your circuit will flow in THAT direction, causing a build-up of charge in the capacitor. I have no idea what the "top of wire" or "bottom of wire" refers to...

Zz.
 
suppose that the circles on this page each represent my hand, with my fingers curled out of the page, and thumb pointing in direction of current (that is, to the right)

if my hand were at circle #1 (top), then current is clockwise
if my hand were at circle #2 (bottom), current is counter clockwise

the direction of current as indicated by the right hand rule is to the right. however, depending on where your hand is, that current is either going clockwise or counterclockwise

im terribly stumped and exam is tomorrow :confused:
 

Attachments

  • nw1017-n.gif
    nw1017-n.gif
    1.6 KB · Views: 546
michaelw said:
suppose that the circles on this page each represent my hand, with my fingers curled out of the page, and thumb pointing in direction of current (that is, to the right)

if my hand were at circle #1, then current is clockwise
if my hand were at circle #2, current is counter clockwise

the direction of current as indicated by the right hand rule is to the right. however, depending on where your hand is, that current is either going clockwise or counterclockwise

im terribly stumped and exam is tomorrow :confused:

No, you are applying the rule in an incorrect fashion. Your THUMB, in this case, points in the direction of the magnetic field, not your curled fingers. Why? It is because the magnetic field is "LINEAR", and has a straight line geometry. It is the CURRENT that is "curling".

For example, look at the current moving in a circular loop. How do you determine what direction the B field is? You curl your FINGERS in the direction that the current is moving, and then how your thumb points is the direction of the B field.

Now look at another situation. What if you have a straight wire with a current? Here, the current now is the one with a LINEAR geometry, i.e. moving in a straight line. In this case, the THUMB now represents the current (thumb=straight). The magnetic field is the one curling around the wire. So your curled fingers respresents the direction of the magnetic field.

Moral of the story: use your thumb to represent the "thing" that's moving in a straight line.

Zz.
 
oops it appears I've goofed :)
i was mixing up thumb/fingers (And it looks like you replied already =)

thanks for the tip about the linearity
youre a savior

thanks again!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top