Why doesn't the hydrogen spectrum show binding energies of 4.53 or 2.26 evolts?

  • Thread starter Thread starter edguy99
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energies Hydrogen
edguy99
Gold Member
Messages
449
Reaction score
28
Just joined so I hope I'm in the right place:

My Question: I read that in the creation of a water molecules, a pair of hydrogen molecules break apart releasing 4.53 evolts of energy.
Why does the hydrogen spectrum show binding energies of -13.6, -3.4 ,-1.511, -.85, -.544 but not 4.53 or even 2.26 evolts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the water molecule is not a hydrogen atom. The water molecule's quantum mechanics is much more difficult to solve because it is a many body system whereas, effectively, the hydrogen atom is a single particle system. a hydrogen molecule, similarly, is not a hydrogen atom. a hydrogen molecule is also more difficult.
 
Thanks for the reply. In a little more detail, I am trying to draw graphics to represent the bonding energies for Hydrogen and Hydrogen2 molecules and eventually build a water molecule.

To do this, I am connecting the most likely location of the electron(s) to the proton(s) and showing the energy of the photon produced if the bond is broken. The problem I have with this representation is when you break Hydrogen2 bonds, do you get 2.26 evolt photons and if so, why wouldn't this level of radiation show up in a hydrogen spectrum? Or does it?

I hope the little picture below helps show what I am trying to draw.
 

Attachments

  • orbital.JPG
    orbital.JPG
    31.2 KB · Views: 543
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top