Why Donor Blood O Doesn't Stimulate an Immune Response in Recipient A

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cheman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Blood Response
AI Thread Summary
Transfusing O blood into an A blood recipient is generally considered safe because O blood lacks A antigens, minimizing the risk of an immune response. Concerns arise regarding the presence of anti-A antibodies in O blood, which could theoretically lead to agglutination when mixed with A blood. However, this reaction is mitigated by the low levels of anti-A antibodies typically found in O blood donors, particularly when only red blood cells are transfused. In emergency situations where blood types are unknown, O blood is often used despite the potential for some destruction of the recipient's red blood cells. The discussion emphasizes that the severity of the immune response depends on the ratio of antibodies to blood cells; a higher concentration of A cells to anti-A antibodies in O blood results in minimal agglutination, while the reverse scenario can lead to severe reactions. Additionally, special considerations apply in cases involving mothers with O blood types and their A-type children, particularly regarding the Rh factor in subsequent pregnancies.
Cheman
Messages
235
Reaction score
1
If we give someone with blood group A a transfusion using an O doner we say they are safe, since the O blood cells will not possesses antigens to stimulate an immune response in the recipient.

But surely the O doner blood with contain anti-A antibodies and memory cells that will be stimulated by the A blood cells and should surely lead to agglutination and an immune response - but this doesn't happen. Why?

Thanks in advance. :smile:
 
Biology news on Phys.org
It is better to give a matching blood type, but in an emergency when the bloodtype is not known group O blood can be given, this may indeed destroy some of the recipients red blood cells. However nowadays a preparation of only red blood cells is given.
 
also, you would expect that the level of anti-A antibodies would be extremely low, probably even none for most O-type people.

An exception would possibly be a mother of O-type blood that gave birth to an A-type child, or vice versa.
 
Gerben is true, it is also important to understand that it's a matter of dose:

From O to A means that there are few anti-A antibodies to a lot of A type blood, only little agglutination will take place.

Some A blood to an O individual, means that there is a lot of anti-A to a little A type blood. It is now that a severe reaction will take place.
 
quetzalcoatl9 said:
An exception would possibly be a mother of O-type blood that gave birth to an A-type child, or vice versa.
Only the rhesus factor is of concern during the second pregnancy of a Rh- mother.
 
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
Back
Top