Why Don’t Satellites Fall to Earth Despite Constantly Falling?

AI Thread Summary
Satellites and planets do not fall into Earth or the Sun because their forward momentum balances the gravitational pull, allowing them to maintain a stable orbit. While gravity does act on these objects, causing them to accelerate, their constant change in direction means their velocity is not constant in the traditional sense. Instead, the velocity remains uniform in terms of speed while continuously changing direction, which is a form of acceleration. If an orbiting body were to lose its forward momentum, it would indeed fall towards the object it orbits. Understanding this balance between gravitational force and forward momentum is key to grasping orbital mechanics.
john fairbanks
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
when a satalite orbits the Earth my text states that it is constantly falling into the Earth as it moves tangentially -- my question is why doesn't the speed of the object falling into the Earth increase radially since it is acted upon by the force of gravity, a force of gravity would cause an object to accelerate! so the falling velocity should not be constant like the tangential speed -- in fact all planets should fall into what they are orbiting around. But they don't so please help!:confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Keep in mind that 'acceleration' can mean a change of direction just as properly as a change of speed. A satellite is constantly changing direction as it follows the curvature around its parent.
 
The planets would fall into the sun if they had no "forward" momentum. Think of what would happen if the sun suddenly disappered. The Earth would just go in a straight line tanget to the previous orbit. A planet orbits because it has enough forward momentum to exacly balance the pull of gravity.
 
The planets would fall into the sun if they had no "forward" momentum. Think of what would happen if the sun suddenly disappered. The Earth would just go in a straight line tanget to the previous orbit. A planet orbits because it has enough forward momentum to exacly balance the pull of gravity.
 
Thnaks for responding, they move tangent to the orbit at a uniform velocity but the force of gravity should accelerate the satellite or planet, just like in our atmosphere, speed increases as a body falls due to gravity. it accelerates, the fall is not a constant speed -- so why does the velocity of the fall of a satellite stay the same. du to accelerationdarisI kno
 
john fairbanks said:
Thnaks for responding, they move tangent to the orbit at a uniform velocity but the force of gravity should accelerate the satellite or planet, just like in our atmosphere, speed increases as a body falls due to gravity. it accelerates, the fall is not a constant speed -- so why does the velocity of the fall of a satellite stay the same. :confused:
 
The velocity does not remain the same. Velocity is a vector (it entails both speed and direction). Since the direction is constantly changing, so is the velocity... which is the definition of 'acceleration'.
 
Back
Top