Why Don't Unit Vectors in Cartesian Coordinates Change with Time?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 4K views
PhysicsKid0123
Messages
95
Reaction score
1
Quick question (a little rusty on this): Why don't unit vectors in Cartesian Coordinates not change with time? For example, suppose [tex]\mathbf{r} (t) = x(t) \mathbf{x} + y(t) \mathbf{y} + z(t) \mathbf{z}[/tex] How exactly do we know that the unit vectors don't change with time?

Or in other words, what is the argument that justifies this expression: [tex]\frac{d }{dt}\mathbf{x} = 0[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
They can change with time. [itex]\mathbb{r(t)} = \sin{t}\mathbb{x} + \cos{t}\mathbb{y}[/itex] is a unit vector that changes with time. If none of the components depend on time, the derivative will be 0. Otherwise the derivative will be another vector.
 
vancouver_water said:
They can change with time. [itex]\mathbb{r(t)} = \sin{t}\mathbb{x} + \cos{t}\mathbb{y}[/itex] is a unit vector that changes with time. If none of the components depend on time, the derivative will be 0. Otherwise the derivative will be another vector.
I'm talking about the unit vectors in Cartesian coordinates themselves [tex]\mathbf{e}_1 = \mathbf{x}, \mathbf{e}_2 = \mathbf{y}, \mathbf{e}_3 = \mathbf{z}[/tex]
 
##\mathbb{x}## for example can be defined as the vector from the origin to the point ## (1,0,0) ##. Since the two points are not changing with time, the vector won't change with time either.
 
vancouver_water said:
##\mathbb{x}## for example can be defined as the vector from the origin to the point ## (1,0,0) ##. Since the two points are not changing with time, the vector won't change with time either.
okay, that's true, now I remember. Thanks.