Vectors in Cartesian Cylindrical Spherical

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of vectors at specific points in Cartesian, cylindrical, and spherical coordinate systems. Participants explore the implications of vector representation and the conditions under which vectors are considered perpendicular, particularly in relation to a given point in spherical coordinates.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the meaning of a vector being defined at a point P(x,y,z) and whether vectors should always start at the origin.
  • Another participant clarifies that while position vectors start at the origin, vectors can be associated with points away from the origin, affecting their representation in different coordinate systems.
  • It is noted that the direction of unit vectors in Cartesian coordinates remains invariant, while in spherical coordinates, it depends on the specific point at which they are applied.
  • A participant suggests that the discussion may involve tangent vectors of a curve, which could explain the relationship between coordinates and vector properties.
  • Links to external resources are provided to illustrate the behavior of unit vectors at specific points in spherical coordinates.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the significance of the point at which vectors are defined, with some emphasizing the importance of the coordinate system and others questioning its relevance to vector perpendicularity. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these interpretations.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight that the interpretation of vectors may depend on the context of their application, such as whether they are treated as position vectors or tangent vectors along a curve. There is also mention of the need for further clarification on the relationship between spherical coordinates and vector properties.

ha9981
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
I do not understand when we are given a vector at point P(x,y,z) or in different forms cylindrical and spherical. What does it mean at point?? I mean aren't vectors supposed to start at origin, even if they don't how will that make a difference in their magnitude or angle between them.

For example we are given two vectors A(2,-2, 1) and B(1,2,-2). They are in different systems A is in spherical and B in in cylindrical and I don't have a problem handling that. Now what does it mean when it says: if they are perpendicular at spherical coordinate point P(2, theta, 60 deg) find theta. Now I know dot product is zero when they are perpendicular. I have no idea how how this has anything to do with theta as what does it mean when it says at point P?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ha9981 said:
I do not understand when we are given a vector at point P(x,y,z) or in different forms cylindrical and spherical. What does it mean at point?? I mean aren't vectors supposed to start at origin, even if they don't how will that make a difference in their magnitude or angle between them.

For example we are given two vectors A(2,-2, 1) and B(1,2,-2). They are in different systems A is in spherical and B in in cylindrical and I don't have a problem handling that. Now what does it mean when it says: if they are perpendicular at spherical coordinate point P(2, theta, 60 deg) find theta. Now I know dot product is zero when they are perpendicular. I have no idea how how this has anything to do with theta as what does it mean when it says at point P?
Hello ha9981.

Position vectors start at the origin. In general vectors are associated with points quite removed from the origin. Perhaps it's the way that vector addition is presented that makes it seem that vectors may be moved around at will.

The direction of unit vectors, \hat{i},\,\hat{j},\,\hat{k} for Cartesian coordinates, (x, y, z) is invariant under change of position.

The direction of the unit vectors for spherical coordinates, \hat{r},\,\hat{\theta},\,\hat{\phi} depends on the coordinate of the point at which they are applied.

Translate your vectors, \vec{A},\,\text{ and }\vec{B} into rectilinear coordinates at different positions, and you will get different results.
 
Look at this link to http://mathworld.wolfram.com/SphericalCoordinates.html" .

At point (x, y, z) = (1, 0, 0):

\hat{r}=\hat{i},\ \hat{\theta}=\hat{j},\ \hat{\phi}=-\hat{k}\,.

At point (x, y, z) = (–1, 0, 0):

\hat{r}=-\hat{i},\ \hat{\theta}=\hat{j},\ \hat{\phi}=-\hat{k}\,.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ha9981 said:
I do not understand when we are given a vector at point P(x,y,z) or in different forms cylindrical and spherical. What does it mean at point?? I mean aren't vectors supposed to start at origin, even if they don't how will that make a difference in their magnitude or angle between them.

For example we are given two vectors A(2,-2, 1) and B(1,2,-2). They are in different systems A is in spherical and B in in cylindrical and I don't have a problem handling that. Now what does it mean when it says: if they are perpendicular at spherical coordinate point P(2, theta, 60 deg) find theta.
This doesn't make sense. Two vectors are either perpendicular or they're not. Coordinates don't have anything to do with it. However, if you're dealing with the tangent vectors of a curve, this is of course a bunch of different vectors, one at each point on the curve:

If C:[a,b]→ℝ3 is a curve, then C'(t)=(C'1(t),C'2(t),C'3(t)) is the tangent vector of the curve at C(t). In particular, if C(t) is the position at time t, then C'(t) is the velocity at time t.

So is it possible that your book is talking about the tangent vectors of a curve?

SammyS said:
Look at this link to http://mathworld.wolfram.com/SphericalCoordinates.html" .

At point (x, y, z) = (1, 0, 0):

\hat{r}=\hat{i},\ \hat{\theta}=\hat{j},\ \hat{\phi}=-\hat{k}\,.

At point (x, y, z) = (–1, 0, 0):

\hat{r}=-\hat{i},\ \hat{\theta}=\hat{j},\ \hat{\phi}=-\hat{k}\,.
These results are found by choosing a specific point in ℝ3 (i.e. a specific vector in ℝ3), and treating one of the three spherical coordinates as a variable while holding the others constant. This defines a curve through the point. The tangent of that curve is found by differentiation (as I described above), and the result is then normalized to length 1.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K