Why Don't We Use the Jacobian in Surface Integrals?

Click For Summary
The discussion clarifies that the Jacobian is not used in surface integrals because the process does not involve changing between coordinate systems of the same dimension. When evaluating a surface integral of a function defined on a two-dimensional surface in three-dimensional space, the differential area element dS is calculated using the cross product of the partial derivatives, ||ru X rv|| dA. The Jacobian applies when transitioning between two three-dimensional coordinate systems, such as when parameters include an additional variable, as in x = x(u, v, w). In such cases, the Jacobian is necessary to account for the change in dimensions. Therefore, the Jacobian is relevant only when the integral involves a full three-dimensional transformation.
IniquiTrance
Messages
185
Reaction score
0
Why is it that when we evaluate a surface integral of:

f(x, y ,z) over dS, where

x = x(u, v)
y = y(u, v)
z = z(u, v)

dS is equal to ||ru X rv|| dA

Why don't we use the jacobian here when we change coordinate systems?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because you are NOT "changing coordinate systems"- not in the sense of replacing one 3 dimensional coordinate system with another or replacing one 2 dimensional coordinate system with another. The Jacobian is the determinant of an n by n matrix and so requires that you have the same dimension on both sides. That is not the situation when you have a two dimensional surface in a three dimensional space.
 
What would be a case then where the jacobian matrix would be used in evaluating a surface integral?

Thanks for the response.
 
Would the Jacobian be used if:

x = x(u, v, w)
y = y(u, v, w)
z = z(u, v, w)

?
 
Yes, but of course that's not a "surface integral"- that's changing from one three-dimensional coordinate system to another. You might, after forming the integral over a surface, decide that the integral would be simpler if you chose different coordinates, that is a different parameterization, for the surface. Then you would use the Jacobian to change from one two-dimensional coordinate system to another.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
814
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K