Why energy level of one dimension problem is descrete?

sadegh4137
Messages
72
Reaction score
0
in the book of quantum mechanics concept and application by Zettili, chapter 4 write a theorem, that is:

in one dimensional problem the energy level of a bound state system are discrete and not degenerate.

i can not prove this theorem.

can you help me to do this!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First there are exceptions, e.g. when you have a symmetric potential with an infinitely high barrier.
In that case you can find two degenerate bound states.
Generally, you can refrain to the theory of differential equations.
For any energy the Schroedinger equation, which is a differential equation of second order, has two solutions (which may not be normalizable), so there can be at most two degenerate bound states.
In the case of regular (not infinite) potentials, fiddling around with the Wronskian, you can show that at most one of the two solutions can be a bound state, the other solution will diverge and not be in the Hilbert space.
 
i can't understand your answer!

we always find two solution for Schrodinger equation.
for example well potential has two answer and the others!

please explain it for me!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...

Similar threads

Back
Top