Why Faraday's law works with superconductors?

AI Thread Summary
Faraday's law indicates that changing magnetic flux induces voltage, but in superconductors, which have zero resistance, the internal electric field is absent, suggesting voltage should be zero. However, transient electric fields can exist momentarily during changes in magnetic flux, allowing currents to flow until steady-state conditions are reached. These induced currents in superconductors respond to external magnetic fields and reside primarily on the surface, adhering to the skin effect. Once the current is established, no internal electric field is necessary to maintain it. Thus, while superconductors can exhibit transient electric fields, they ultimately maintain a zero electric field in equilibrium.
DoobleD
Messages
259
Reaction score
20
1: Faraday's law states that a changing magnetic flux induces a voltage.

2: Voltage is the integral of E field with distance.

3: In a superconductor, or equivalently an with idealized wires having 0 resistance, there can't be any electric field inside. Thus, voltage in a superconductor should always be 0.

My question: how is it possible that Faraday's law induces a voltage in superconductors? I know it does, but I don't understand how it is possible.

Can there be some E fields during brief instants in superconductors? During the variation of magnetic flux?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Superconductors are free of internal magnetic fields (in the regions where they are superconducting).
Faraday allows to induce currents that cancel any electric fields that might arise - up to a limit where superconduction breaks down.
 
mfb said:
Superconductors are free of internal magnetic fields (in the regions where they are superconducting).
Faraday allows to induce currents that cancel any electric fields that might arise - up to a limit where superconduction breaks down.

But for the current to start flowing, isn't there at some point at least an E field inside the superconductor? Once current is flowing in it, ok, no need for any E field to make it keep going, but to start the flow?
 
DoobleD said:
But for the current to start flowing, isn't there at some point at least an E field inside the superconductor? Once current is flowing in it, ok, no need for any E field to make it keep going, but to start the flow?

There's nothing that says that you cannot have a transient field. It is just that under equilibrium or steady-state situation, you do not have such fields inside the superconductor.

Besides, these currents reside on the surface, and they are in response to the external field on the surface up to the skin depth.

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes DoobleD
Thanks. :)
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top