Why have a minimum temperature

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter cataldo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Minimum Temperature
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of minimum and maximum temperature in nature, specifically addressing why there is a defined minimum temperature (absolute zero) but no established maximum temperature. Participants explore theoretical implications and analogies related to temperature, energy, and atomic structure.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants compare the question of temperature limits to the existence of the lowest and highest natural numbers, suggesting a conceptual parallel.
  • There is a proposal that, in principle, temperature could be infinite if kinetic energy is infinite, but this may be bounded by the total energy of the universe.
  • One participant argues that increasing energy could lead to the stripping of electrons and the breakdown of atomic structure, implying a limit to how much energy can be applied while maintaining atomic integrity.
  • Another participant suggests that at absolute zero, subatomic particles have no kinetic energy, raising the question of how one could further reduce motion.
  • There is speculation about an upper limit to temperature, potentially related to conditions present at the beginning of the universe, where matter might disintegrate at extreme temperatures.
  • A request for mathematical proof regarding temperature limits, particularly at atomic and subatomic levels, is made by one participant.
  • Discussion includes a clarification that temperature may not be strictly defined for atoms, indicating a possible broader interpretation of temperature in different contexts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the existence of a maximum temperature and the implications of energy levels on atomic structure. No consensus is reached regarding the existence of an upper limit to temperature or the definitions involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity of the topic, including the dependence on definitions of temperature and energy, as well as the implications of atomic and subatomic behavior under extreme conditions.

cataldo
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody...I have a sutupid questionf for you. Question is:
Why have i a minimum temperature (-273 celsisus) and no maximum temperature in nature?
Tanks...
 
Science news on Phys.org


its not much different from asking why is there a lowest natural number, but no highest natural number?

you can have infinite temperature, in principle, with infinite kinetic energy of the particles involved...
if you want to get technical, it would be bounded by something proportional to the total energy of the universe.
 


Mephisto said:
its not much different from asking why is there a lowest natural number, but no highest natural number?

you can have infinite temperature, in principle, with infinite kinetic energy of the particles involved...
if you want to get technical, it would be bounded by something proportional to the total energy of the universe.


What? Atoms are made of subatomic particles. The more energy you dump into your system, the more likely it is that you will strip the electrons off, then the nucleus itself, and then that into smaller particles. You can't have any arbitrarily high energy level while maintaining the atomic structure of what your looking at.
 


cataldo said:
Hi everybody...I have a sutupid questionf for you. Question is:
Why have i a minimum temperature (-273 celsisus) and no maximum temperature in nature?
Tanks...

It's jusk like you have a balance, in which you can put something and measure its weight. The weight can be zero, can be a certain value , a bigger value and bigger... you can not have the top end if the balance allows . speaking differently, it has lower limit (zero) , but has no higher limit.
 


cataldo said:
Hi everybody...I have a sutupid questionf for you. Question is:
Why have i a minimum temperature (-273 celsisus) and no maximum temperature in nature?
Tanks...

Just think of what temperature means. At absolute zero, the subatomic particles aren't moving at all. There is no kinetic energy. If something is not moving at all, how can you make it move less?

Also, I may be wrong about this, but I'd imagine there is some upper limit on temperature. We would need conditions like the very beginning of the universe to have certain temperatures. At some temperature, I'd imagine matter would shake itself apart completely.
 


tanks for your answers...can you ask if there is a mathematical proof on this matter especially at atomic and sub-atomic level?
Best regards
Aldo
 


Cyrus said:
What? Atoms are made of subatomic particles. The more energy you dump into your system, the more likely it is that you will strip the electrons off, then the nucleus itself, and then that into smaller particles. You can't have any arbitrarily high energy level while maintaining the atomic structure of what your looking at.

right, but you can still talk about the kinetic energy of the constituents, whatever they may be. Is temperature defined strictly for atoms?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
926
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K