The thread discusses the functionality and validity of the website http://optionalreaction.com/articles/ghd/index.htm, with participants questioning its content and the claims made within it. The discussion includes elements of humor, skepticism, and technical reasoning related to physics concepts.
Participants generally disagree on the validity and seriousness of the claims made on the website, with some viewing it as nonsensical while others question the intent behind the discussion. The overall tone suggests a lack of consensus on the website's content.
Some participants reference basic physics concepts and educational experiences, indicating a potential gap in understanding or interpretation of the claims made on the website. There are unresolved questions regarding the mathematical claims and their implications.
This discovery has been made available to the universe in the hope that it will help ease the pain and suffering of those who are victims of the universe.
Sense of humour. OK, so it's a joke. And you were hoping to dupe others into making serious replies?optionalreaction said:I guess you guys have no sense of humour here?
Just in case you're serious, do the math. Its pretty straightforward that if f=ma then ma=f. You flipped an equation over and somehow got a different answer doing it one way than the other way!optionalreaction said:Hi,
Could anyone tell me why http://optionalreaction.com/articles/ghd/index.htm doesn't work?
Many thanks in advance (this problem has been bothering me for a long time),
Keith
That was my favorite part.The release of this information (November 2002) will stop any patents.
Accelerating a ball balanced on a 45 degree slope needs only ~62.5% of the energy needed to directly accelerate a ball of equal mass.