Why Inertia is so interesting?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Angelos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inertia Interesting
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of inertia, particularly why it is considered interesting or strange within the context of modern physics. Participants explore the challenges of explaining inertia, its implications in classical mechanics and relativity, and its relationship with mass and gravity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions what makes inertia strange, suggesting it seems normal for particles to maintain their velocity in an accelerating reference frame.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of citing sources when discussing interpretations of inertia, noting that misunderstandings can lead to moot questions.
  • A participant expresses uncertainty about the difficulty of explaining inertia in modern physics, admitting their knowledge is limited to classical mechanics and special relativity.
  • One participant raises the issue of why certain particles have specific masses, questioning the relationship between mass and inertia.
  • A different participant mentions Einstein's consideration of gravitational and inertial mass, referencing Mach's principle as a related concept.
  • Another participant speculates on the implications of a universe without inertia, suggesting it would lead to chaotic conditions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the nature of inertia and its explanation, with no consensus reached on the core question of why inertia is considered interesting or difficult to explain.

Contextual Notes

Some participants acknowledge limitations in their understanding of inertia, particularly in relation to modern physics concepts. There is also a noted dependence on interpretations of sources and the potential for miscommunication regarding the topic.

Angelos
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hi...

Many times I have read articles about how strange inertia is and that no theory we have so far can not explain it etc. However I don't see that problem with it. What is so weird on inertia? It seems to me as normal thing that if some reference frame accelerate the particles in this frame are trying to stay with the velocity they had. It's probably because I really have knowledge of classical mechanics only. Please can you help me here and show me why Inertia is so interesting? Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Angelos said:
Hi...

Many times I have read articles about how strange inertia is and that no theory we have so far can not explain it etc.

Regulars on here will know what's coming...

In this forum, whenever someone says "I read somewhere..." or "I heard somewhere...", we would PREFER that you give an exact reference to what this "somewhere" is. Tell us the exact source so that we can double check what you thought you have understood out of it.

It makes no sense to try and correct or explain what you read without figuring out if what you interpreted is what was being written in the first place. We can't tell if you read some crackpot article, or if you understood something incorrectly, or if the article is pointing out beyond the scope of what one can explain currently.

I have seen many cases where, after we spend a lot of effort in trying to explain to the reader, it turned out that the reader misinterpreted the article in the first place. So the whole question was moot! I'm sure you can imagine why such a thing can be annoying and frustrating.

So to prevent that (and this applies to everyone who has the intention of posting such a question), please CITE YOUR SOURCES clearly! If you can't, then it can't be THAT important. Or maybe this would be a good warning in the future for people to SAVE and RECORD your sources whenever you read anything interesting or puzzling.

Zz.
 
Ok. I'm sorry for that. As you might expected I don't have any certain sources and so I will try to rewrite my question.

Why is it so hard to explain inertia in terms of modern physics? I'm high school junior so I know only classical mechanics and little bit of special relativity. You probably will want know how I know that it's hard. So the answer is that I heart it. I cannot vindicate it differently. If it is not true just report this topic and I'm sorry for your time.

I will be glad for any help or link to web about this topic.
 
the problem cmoes when you try to explain why ceratin particles have the masses they do, ie why doesn't a brick have 10000x the amount of inertia it does right now.
 
Inertia becomes an issue when gravity is considered. Einstein thought about gravitational mass and inertial mass and decided they must be the same.

Try looking up Mach's principle in Wiki.

But I'm not sure what you are actually asking.
 
Without inertia, any mass could be accelerated to the speed of light with little difficulty, and that would make for a very strange universe indeed; one which would likely be in constant destructive chaos.
Just some thoughts...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K