Why is a conserved vector field a gradient of a certain func

Za Kh
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
I know that if a vector field is conserved then there exits a function such that the gradient of this function is equal to the vector field but am just curious to know the reason of it.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi ZA,

You of course googled conservative vector field but there must be something that isn't clear to you. What specifically ?
 
BvU said:
Hi ZA,

You of course googled conservative vector field but there must be something that isn't clear to you. What specifically ?
Hi! I've figured this out, by the stocks theorem and that the work done by a conservative force on a closed curve is zero but why it isn't true for the non conservative force?
 
That comes from the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus", that if F is a differentiable function such that F'= f then \int_a^b= f(b)- f(a). A "conservative force" is the derivative of some "energy function". The integral depends only on the end points, not the path between the end points. The integral around a closed path, since the "end points" are the same point, is 0.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top