Why Is a Particular Solution Necessary in Differential Equations?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter LumenPlacidum
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the necessity of including a particular solution in the context of differential equations, particularly focusing on the distinction between general and particular solutions in both homogeneous and non-homogeneous cases. Participants explore the theoretical underpinnings and implications of these solutions.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the particular solution is necessary for non-homogeneous equations, where the right-hand side of the differential equation is a function rather than zero.
  • Others argue that the general solution represents a family of solutions characterized by parameters, while the particular solution addresses specific boundary or initial conditions.
  • A participant suggests an analogy between the general solution for non-homogeneous systems and the constant of integration in ordinary integration, emphasizing the role of superposition.
  • Another participant clarifies that the general solution can be expressed as the sum of the complementary solution (associated with the homogeneous problem) and the particular solution.
  • Specific examples are provided to illustrate the relationship between homogeneous and non-homogeneous problems, detailing how the general solution encompasses both types of solutions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying degrees of understanding regarding the role of particular solutions, with some clarifying definitions and relationships while others question the completeness of the general solution without the particular component. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the necessity and implications of these distinctions.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include potential misunderstandings of the definitions of general and particular solutions, as well as the implications of boundary conditions and the superposition principle. Some assumptions about the nature of the functions involved in the equations are not fully explored.

LumenPlacidum
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
If the purpose of the general form of the solution to a differential equation is to represent a formula with parameters for the solutions to that differential equation, why is it that we typically want to add some particular solution to the general one?

Solution = General Solution + Particular Solution.

I suppose I understand why you'd want it there, but the part that I don't remember from my Diff. Eq. stuff from long ago is why the particular solution is not included in the general solution.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The particular solution is for the corresponding non-homogeneous equation. In other words, on the right hand side of the differential equation, zero is replaced with some function.
 
A particular solution is a solution that satisfies boundary or initial value conditions. It shows up in inhomogeneous differential equations, as far as I recall.
 
So, is this appropriate?

The general solution for a non-homogeneous system of differential equations is analogous to the +C of integration. Because of the superposition principle, any function of the form of the general solution COULD be a part of the solution for the ODE since it would have become exactly zero upon substitution for y.
 
LumenPlacidum said:
If the purpose of the general form of the solution to a differential equation is to represent a formula with parameters for the solutions to that differential equation, why is it that we typically want to add some particular solution to the general one?

Solution = General Solution + Particular Solution.
No, this isn't quite right. It is General Solution = Complementary solution + Particular Solution = yc + yp. The complementary solution is the solution to the associated homogeneous problem.
LumenPlacidum said:
I suppose I understand why you'd want it there, but the part that I don't remember from my Diff. Eq. stuff from long ago is why the particular solution is not included in the general solution.
The homogeneous problem is f(t, y, y', ... ,y(n)) = 0; for example, y'' + 4y' + 4y = 0.
The nonhomogeneous problem is f(t, y, y', ... ,y(n)) = g(t); for example, y'' + 4y' + 4y = t.
The solution to the homogeneous problem is a linear combination of e-2t and te-2t. As it turns out for my example, the particular solution is yp = -5/4 + t/4.

We know that yc is a solution to the homogeneous problem, which means for my example, yc'' + 4yc' + 4yc = 0. We also know that yp is a particular solution of the nonhomogeneous problem, so yp'' + 4yp' + 4yp = t.

Then for a general solution y = yc + yp, we will have y'' + 4y' + 4y = t, regardless of which linear combination of e-2t and te-2t we choose.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K