Why Is a Particular Solution Necessary in Differential Equations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter LumenPlacidum
  • Start date Start date
LumenPlacidum
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
If the purpose of the general form of the solution to a differential equation is to represent a formula with parameters for the solutions to that differential equation, why is it that we typically want to add some particular solution to the general one?

Solution = General Solution + Particular Solution.

I suppose I understand why you'd want it there, but the part that I don't remember from my Diff. Eq. stuff from long ago is why the particular solution is not included in the general solution.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The particular solution is for the corresponding non-homogeneous equation. In other words, on the right hand side of the differential equation, zero is replaced with some function.
 
A particular solution is a solution that satisfies boundary or initial value conditions. It shows up in inhomogeneous differential equations, as far as I recall.
 
So, is this appropriate?

The general solution for a non-homogeneous system of differential equations is analogous to the +C of integration. Because of the superposition principle, any function of the form of the general solution COULD be a part of the solution for the ODE since it would have become exactly zero upon substitution for y.
 
LumenPlacidum said:
If the purpose of the general form of the solution to a differential equation is to represent a formula with parameters for the solutions to that differential equation, why is it that we typically want to add some particular solution to the general one?

Solution = General Solution + Particular Solution.
No, this isn't quite right. It is General Solution = Complementary solution + Particular Solution = yc + yp. The complementary solution is the solution to the associated homogeneous problem.
LumenPlacidum said:
I suppose I understand why you'd want it there, but the part that I don't remember from my Diff. Eq. stuff from long ago is why the particular solution is not included in the general solution.
The homogeneous problem is f(t, y, y', ... ,y(n)) = 0; for example, y'' + 4y' + 4y = 0.
The nonhomogeneous problem is f(t, y, y', ... ,y(n)) = g(t); for example, y'' + 4y' + 4y = t.
The solution to the homogeneous problem is a linear combination of e-2t and te-2t. As it turns out for my example, the particular solution is yp = -5/4 + t/4.

We know that yc is a solution to the homogeneous problem, which means for my example, yc'' + 4yc' + 4yc = 0. We also know that yp is a particular solution of the nonhomogeneous problem, so yp'' + 4yp' + 4yp = t.

Then for a general solution y = yc + yp, we will have y'' + 4y' + 4y = t, regardless of which linear combination of e-2t and te-2t we choose.
 
Thread 'Direction Fields and Isoclines'
I sketched the isoclines for $$ m=-1,0,1,2 $$. Since both $$ \frac{dy}{dx} $$ and $$ D_{y} \frac{dy}{dx} $$ are continuous on the square region R defined by $$ -4\leq x \leq 4, -4 \leq y \leq 4 $$ the existence and uniqueness theorem guarantees that if we pick a point in the interior that lies on an isocline there will be a unique differentiable function (solution) passing through that point. I understand that a solution exists but I unsure how to actually sketch it. For example, consider a...
Back
Top