Why Is Acceleration Due to Gravity a Constant? - Comments

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the nature of gravitational force and its constancy, particularly questioning the role of gravitons in this phenomenon. Participants express curiosity about how gravitons facilitate an attractive force between two bodies. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding curved spacetime in relation to gravity. Additionally, there is a suggestion to explore the Relativity forum for deeper insights. The thread highlights the complexity of gravitational interactions and the need for further exploration of theoretical concepts.
ZapperZ
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
32,814
Reaction score
4,725
ZapperZ submitted a new PF Insights post

Why Is Acceleration Due to Gravity a Constant?

gravityacceleration-80x80.png


Continue reading the Original PF Insights Post.
 
  • Like
Likes Abhijeet Verma and Student100
Physics news on Phys.org
Beautiful. Thank you very much.
 
But what is the cause of gravitational force between two bodies (they say exchange of gravitons)?? I mean how can exchange of gravitons between two bodies make them exert force on each other and that too only attractive??
 
The word "graviton" appears nowhere in this Insight.
 
Was expecting something like

"It isn't, go home folks"
 
sandesh baghmar said:
But what is the cause of gravitational force between two bodies (they say exchange of gravitons)?? I mean how can exchange of gravitons between two bodies make them exert force on each other and that too only attractive??

It's all about curved spacetime! Hit up the Relativity forum for more info please, as this thread is for questions and comments regarding the insights article.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top