Why is another row operation necessary to obtain the matrix on the second line?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmathmad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Echelon Form Row
mathmathmad
Messages
50
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



[PLAIN]http://img260.imageshack.us/img260/727/picture2mg.png

just wondering.. isn't the the matrix on the 1st line already in its reduced row echelon form?
why is another row operation required to obtain the matrix on the 2nd line? (notice the changes to the matrix on the right)

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know what you're trying to do in this problem, but I'll answer your questions. The 3x3 matrix at the right in the top line is NOT in reduced row-echelon form. The matrix at the right in the bottom line is almost in row-echelon form (but not reduced row-echelon form). To get it in row-echelon form, swap the first two rows, then swap the 2nd and 3rd rows.

I think these are the definitions.
Row-echelon form: for each row with a non-zero leading entry, every other row below it has a 0 in that position.
Reduced row-echelon form: same as above, but also every other row above it has a 0 in that position.

Also, you could have done what you did in one step: Add 1 times the 3rd row to the first row.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top