Why is aspirin used in myocardial infarction?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sameeralord
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Aspirin is effective in managing cardiac disorders, particularly in the context of acute myocardial infarction (MI). It works by disaggregating platelets, which is crucial for primary hemostasis. Even if a patient presents within three hours of severe chest pain due to MI, administering aspirin remains beneficial as it can help prevent further thrombus formation and enhance the effects of thrombolytic agents. The concept of a "full thrombus" is misleading in acute situations, as thrombus formation can continue under certain conditions. In cases of established occlusion, mechanical interventions like percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or stenting may be necessary, but aspirin still plays a role in the early management of MI. Understanding the timing and use of antithrombotics versus thrombolytics is essential for effective treatment protocols.
sameeralord
Messages
659
Reaction score
3
Hello,

I'm simply confused how effective is giving aspirin in various cardiac disorder? Ok someone develops severe chest pain, presents to hospital within 3 hours due to MI?Is there any use in giving aspirin. I know aspirin disaggregates platelets, and this is primary haemostasis. Now within 3 hours I believe primary haemostasis is already done, so is their any point in giving aspirin. What I'm basically asking is how long does primary and secondary haemostasis take and also let's say a full thrombus was formed then is the only choice to lyse it with streptokinase, or does aspirin have an effect even after a full thrombus is formed.Then having said all that and if they are only true only use I can see of aspirin is prophylaxis in cardiac disorders or very early MI. Thanks :smile:
 
Biology news on Phys.org
sameeralord said:
Hello,

I'm simply confused how effective is giving aspirin in various cardiac disorder? Ok someone develops severe chest pain, presents to hospital within 3 hours due to MI?Is there any use in giving aspirin. I know aspirin disaggregates platelets, and this is primary haemostasis. Now within 3 hours I believe primary haemostasis is already done, so is their any point in giving aspirin. What I'm basically asking is how long does primary and secondary haemostasis take and also let's say a full thrombus was formed then is the only choice to lyse it with streptokinase, or does aspirin have an effect even after a full thrombus is formed.Then having said all that and if they are only true only use I can see of aspirin is prophylaxis in cardiac disorders or very early MI. Thanks :smile:

Aspirin (ASA) has been shown to have a synergistic effect with a number of thrombolytic agents and is often used in combination with them in the ER/ICU unless there are contraindications. While there is an ideal time period for using such agents, the idea of a "full thrombus" doesn't apply in the acute situation. A thrombus may continue to extend under the right conditions. The real end point is evidence for reperfusion.

http://www.rcpals.com/downloads/fibrinoforACS72006.pdf

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2108852
 
Last edited:
you need to look up the protocols to treating MI, it gives a nice algorithms of what to do. Also unless you have been to a catheter lab you don know how much the coronaries are occluded
 
mazinse said:
Also unless you have been to a catheter lab you don know how much the coronaries are occluded

You need to distinguish between the use of antithrombotics/thrombolytics in the acute situation (MI in progress) and established occluded coronary arteries. In the latter case, mechanical dilatation and the placement of stents or bypass surgery may be indicated, but not the thrombolytic therapy that the OP asked about.

http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/161446-overview

Opening coronary arteries with PCI (see link) may be an option in the acute situation as well, usually if drug treatment fails.
 
Last edited:
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
Back
Top