Why is black hole photon sphere outside the event horizon?

Prof. Hawking
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am preparing a report on black holes and I recently learned about a phenomenon I was previously unaware of: the photon sphere of a black hole. While reading an article on said occurrence (I have now confirmed this on multiple sources) the photon sphere which is the minimum distance anything (in this case light) can orbit from a black hole and the photon sphere is the lower bound where only something going at the speed of light (photons) can orbit.

However the distance from the singularity for this boundary is 1.5 times as far as the event horizon is from the center of the black hole. From what I understand the equation for the velocity required to orbit an orbit an object stabely is v=sqrt((2GM)/r) where G is the gravitational constant M is the mass of the object being orbited and r is the distance from the center of mass of the object ( I found this equation on physicsforums here https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...-speed-for-putting-an-object-in-orbit.299929/). However the formula for escape velocity (the event horizon in the case of a black hole) is v=sqrt((GM)/r).

These formulas would show that to escape from the gravity of a body takes much more energy than to orbit it from the same distance however the speed of light is not enough to orbit outside the minimum escapable distance at the speed of light if this distance is inside the photon sphere so I am rather confused.

Homework Equations


what I found to be the formula for minimum velocity to be in a stable orbit v=sqrt((2GM)/r)
escape velocity v=sqrt((GM)/r)

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
These formulas would show that to escape from the gravity of a body takes much more energy than to orbit it from the same distance...
It is easier to say at a set distance from a body by moving around it than it is to get away completely, just like it is often easier to walk around a solitary mountain than to climb it.

... however the speed of light is not enough to orbit outside the minimum escapable distance at the speed of light if this distance is inside the photon sphere so I am rather confused.
But didn't you just finish explaining that the photon sphere is at the minimum orbit distance?
Therefore the answer is that it is a logical contradiction in the sentence.
 
Simon Bridge said:
It is easier to say at a set distance from a body by moving around it than it is to get away completely, just like it is often easier to walk around a solitary mountain than to climb it.

But didn't you just finish explaining that the photon sphere is at the minimum orbit distance?
Therefore the answer is that it is a logical contradiction in the sentence.
What I don't understand is why that minimum orbital distance is farther away than the minimum escapable distance. It seems like the photon sphere would be inside the event horizon because you don't need to be as far away where the gravity is weaker because it takes less energy to orbit

Also to your second comment I was talking about a photon being unable to orbit between the event horizon and the photon sphere (sorry for confusion)
 
Prof. Hawking said:
what I found to be the formula for minimum velocity to be in a stable orbit v=sqrt((2GM)/r)
escape velocity v=sqrt((GM)/r)

You've essentially got these the wrong way round. Escape velocity is v_e=\sqrt(2Gm/r) and the Newtonian equation for stable orbit is v_s=\sqrt(Gm/r) though in GR in Schwarzschild spacetime (i.e. static black hole), the equation for a stable orbit is-

v_s=\sqrt{\frac{Gm}{r\left(1-\frac{2Gm}{c^2r}\right)}}
 
stevebd1 said:
You've essentially got these the wrong way round. Escape velocity is v_e=\sqrt(2Gm/r) and the Newtonian equation for stable orbit is v_s=\sqrt(Gm/r) though in GR in Schwarzschild spacetime (i.e. static black hole), the equation for a stable orbit is-

v_s=\sqrt{\frac{Gm}{r\left(1-\frac{2Gm}{c^2r}\right)}}
Thank you Steve I realize now that I had the formulas backwards so now this makes perfect sense, also thanks for the more applicable formula for stable orbit,

where did you find this formula as I didn't come across it in any of my googling, is there a reliable online source where I could easily access all these types of less common physics formulas because that would be very helpful in the future
 

Attachments

Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top