Why is Carbon Essential for Understanding Earth's Prehistoric Atmosphere?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pattielli
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth
AI Thread Summary
Carbon is considered the primary element for determining the record of life on planets due to its unique chemical properties, which allow it to form complex molecular structures essential for biological compounds. Unlike silicon, which is less versatile, carbon's reactivity supports the formation of a wide variety of organic molecules. The discussion also touches on the evolution of Earth's atmosphere in prehistoric times, suggesting that resources and literature on this topic can provide further insights. Carbon dating is mentioned as a separate concept, indicating a distinction between carbon's role in life and its use in dating organic materials.
Pattielli
Messages
296
Reaction score
0
I am sorry, I honestly really don't know anything about earthy things.
I have questions, would you please tell me why people say carbon is the first element to determine the record of life on planets ?

Secondly, would you please give me some details about the atmostphere in prehistoric age of our Earth ? What books would say more about this ? please give me the names for me to search my library..

Thank you very much,
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
I'm not sure what your question about the "record of life" intends, Pattielli. But as for as chemical properties, carbon is very reactive in a complicated way, being the basis element of very complicated molecular structures. Silicium/Silicon, on the same place in the system of elements is not nearly as versatile. This is the main reason that carbon is the main element for building biologic compounds, supported by hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, Phosphor, Potassium, Calcium etc etc.

If your question is related to carbon dating, then it's a different story

To get an idea about how Earth and it's atmosphere may have evolved, this may be a good starting place. Lots of links to follow.
 
Thank Andre very much for your explanation,

I actually don't know much about these things, I was incorrect about them.. Thank you for pointing them out...:sm:
 
Hello, I’m currently writing a series of essays on Pangaea, continental drift, and Earth’s geological cycles. While working on my research, I’ve come across some inconsistencies in the existing theories — for example, why the main pressure seems to have been concentrated in the northern polar regions. So I’m curious: is there any data or evidence suggesting that an external cosmic body (an asteroid, comet, or another massive object) could have influenced Earth’s geology in the distant...
Thread 'The Secrets of Prof. Verschure's Rosetta Stones'
(Edit: since the thread title was changed, this first sentence is too cryptic: the original title referred to a Tool song....) Besides being a favorite song by a favorite band, the thread title is a straightforward play on words. This summer, as a present to myself for being promoted, I purchased a collection of thin sections that I believe comprise the research materials of Prof. Rob Verschure, who at the time was faculty in the Geological Institute in Amsterdam. What changed this...

Similar threads

Back
Top