Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Why is cyanide writted as CN- when the negative charge is on carbon?

  1. Oct 16, 2013 #1
    The Title pretty much sums it up.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyanide

    Why is it written like that when it is clear that the carbon must be the one with the negative charge?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Oct 16, 2013 #2

    Simon Bridge

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Convenience. It's actually [CN]-
     
  4. Oct 16, 2013 #3

    Borek

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Charge on polyatomic molecules is almost never localized on a single atom, it is typically spread over part of the molecule. Doesn't mean there are equal parts of the charge on all atoms either, CN- has a "more negative end".
     
  5. Oct 16, 2013 #4
    I guess this then implies to OH- as well. But how should interpret a molecular formula like that when reading it somewhere. As an overall negative molecule, or "cause I know" interpret it as a negative charge on carbon. The same goes with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydroxide I guess then. But this is so frustrating to me now because if the negative charge is not on Oxygen why do they not just simply write it like that. The same goes with the cyanide example why do they have to write it like that when they could just have written it C-N
     
  6. Oct 16, 2013 #5

    Borek

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    It is not an obvious thing to someone just starting with chemistry that charge is not a point like thing, but a cloud spread around some volume, with different densities in different places. We start with simplified models (think Lewis structures) which require electrons to be point like, electron cloud is introduced much later.
     
  7. Oct 16, 2013 #6

    dextercioby

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Insights Author

    The minus in the exponent is shorhand for -1, which is the net charge of the ion (due to the extra electron to the normal shell configuration 'melted' into the triple bond b/w C and N). It's an exponent and nothing more. I believe that the convention to write CN- and not NC- is due to another convention: namely that if you can decompose a molecule into ionic parts, the positive ion is written on the LHS, the negative on the right. That's why you don't write (OH)2 Ca but the reverse. And of course to this convention of positioning the ions as a whole you add the convention to place the element which needs electrons to obtain the octet to the left and the 'neutral' elements to the right of the ion. So it's Ca (OH)2 and not Ca (HO)2. This of course, if you picture chemistry in terms of GN Lewis's model of 1916.

    Elementary (i.e. non-quantum) chemistry contains conventions which may not seem obvious.
     
    Last edited: Oct 16, 2013
  8. Oct 16, 2013 #7
    Oh well, I guess I`ll just deal with it, I mean I can still handle myself around it and I can still do some of the tasks and questions in the book. I understand what they mean, and I don`t really wanna go to deep into this. Thanks though anyway people :)
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted
Similar Discussions: Why is cyanide writted as CN- when the negative charge is on carbon?
Loading...