Why is earth considered to have zero potential potential energy

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the concept of gravitational potential energy, specifically why Earth is often considered to have zero potential energy. Participants explore the implications of this choice, its convenience in calculations, and the relative nature of potential energy across different reference frames.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the designation of zero potential energy at Earth's surface is primarily for convenience in calculations.
  • Others argue that potential energy is relative and can be defined differently depending on the chosen reference point.
  • A participant notes that potential energy has no absolute value and is only meaningful in terms of differences between points.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of defining potential energy at infinity, with some participants questioning its validity.
  • One participant emphasizes that the potential difference is what matters, not the absolute values of potential energy.
  • Concerns are raised about the potential energy of Earth itself, with some participants stating it does not have an "actual" value, while others seek clarification on this point.
  • Several participants highlight that potential energy is not the same as internal energy and that it depends on the relative positions of interacting bodies.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the choice of zero potential energy is arbitrary and based on convenience, but multiple competing views remain regarding the implications and definitions of potential energy. The discussion does not reach a consensus on the "actual" value of Earth's potential energy.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the implications of defining potential energy at different reference points and the meaning of absolute versus relative potential energy. The discussion includes various assumptions about the nature of potential energy and its calculation.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to students and enthusiasts of physics, particularly those exploring concepts of potential energy, reference frames, and gravitational interactions.

Rohit Mallya
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Why is Earth considered to have zero potential[potential energy]...?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


You mean gravitational potential energy at the surface of the earth? Convenience.
 


But why...??
 


What is the reason Sir...?
 


As Russ said, it's for convenience in calculations. For example, the gravitational potential energy for an object of mass m lifted a height h is PE = mgh, where g is the acceleration of gravity at the surface of the Eargh, 0.9m/s^2. You will usually not add on a constant offset of potential energy in your calculations, you just call the PE zero somewhere that is convenient in your situation. It may be the surface of the Earth, or the surface of the Moon, or the top of some tower, whatever.

It doesn't matter because you are usually calculating things that have to do with the change of PE, so you can put your zero point anywhere that is convenient, and just deal with the deltas from that zero point.
 


ok...
But is really P.E. zero...??
 


Anybody help..!
 


Rohit Mallya said:
ok...
But is really P.E. zero...??
PE is relative. In one frame of reference, it can be zero and in another it can be something else.
 


Please give examples for each frames...
 
  • #10


Rohit Mallya said:
Anybody help..!
An object has 0 potential energy with respect to the point it is at.
If you mean can we chose another point lower than the ground as 0 than sure. An example would be choosing the bottom of a well as 0 and using mgh to find velocity of an object that was dropped from ground level.
 
  • #11


Rohit Mallya said:
Please give examples for each frames...
Not possible: there are an infinite number of possible reference frames. Frame choice is completely arbitrary.
 
  • #12


Let me try to be more precise. Potential energy is basically a way to express a particular type of force in a more convenient way. However saying that the potential energy at some point is 0 has NO PHYSICAL MEANING AT ALL. The only physical part of potential energy is a difference in it's value between 2 points. So we can arbitrarily define a zero potential energy anywhere we please (where it is convenient is the best choice). Consider if we define the gravitational potential energy at the surface of the Earth to be 4 in arbitrary units. The potential at 10 length units above that is simple 4 + mg*10, so the DIFFERENCE is simply mg*10. If we define the potential at the surface to be zero, at height 10 the potential energy is 0 + mg*10, so the difference is still mg*10.
 
  • #13


But what if we choose the Earth's potential as infinity? then the potential diffeerence won't be same na?
 
  • #14


Infinity is not a real number, so you shouldn't choose that one!
 
  • #15


Rohit Mallya said:
Why is Earth considered to have zero potential[potential energy]...?

You know, the Newton equation m*a = F does not contain a potential but a potential difference: F = -delta_U/delta_z. Whatever absolute value of potential is chosen U0 in U(z), it disappears (cancels) in the potential difference. So it is chosen arbitralily.

It is not an internal energy. It is a possibility to make a work when one moves along z. The work is just the potential differnece U(z2) - U(z1) where U0 cancels.
 
  • #16


But Sir potential energy means internal energy na?
 
  • #17


hidden energy!
 
  • #18


Potential energy=Hidden energy!
 
  • #19


Rohit Mallya said:
But Sir potential energy means internal energy na?
No, it does not.
 
  • #20


Rohit Mallya said:
But Sir potential energy means internal energy na?

Not at all. By definition the potential energy depends on relative positions of interacting bodies. What happens inside each body (tempreature) is not related to this definition.
 
  • #21


ok so P.E. of Earth is takes to be 0 for convenience sake correct Sir?
 
  • #22


Rohit Mallya said:
ok so P.E. of Earth is takes to be 0 for convenience sake correct Sir?

YES.

It is the potential DIFFERENCE that matters, NOT the potential values themselves.

To understand this, let a, b and c be numbers.

Then, we may set up:

(a+c)-(b+c)=a-b

Do you see that the right-hand side is INDEPENDENT of the number "c"?

Thus, if you at a point A choose to define the potential as either "a" or "a+c" (i.e, DIFFERENT from each other), as long as you at a poiny B then have values "b" or "b+c", respectively, the potential DIFFERENCE will be the same, namely a-b.

Got that?
 
  • #23


yes Sir but if we forget and try to calculate Earth's potential what will be its value?
 
  • #24


Rohit Mallya said:
yes Sir but if we forget and try to calculate Earth's potential what will be its value?

The body's potential on the Earth will anyway depend on from which position we bring a body to the Earth. If from infinity, then it will be G*MEm/RE.
 
  • #25


no I'm asking for earth.what will be Earth's actual value of potential energy?
 
  • #26


Rohit Mallya said:
no I'm asking for earth.what will be Earth's actual value of potential energy?

It doesn't HAVE an "actual", true value.

What is real are the potential differences between the Earth and other objects.

Your question is like:

What is the ACTUAL place of the origin on a road, from which I measure distances in either direction?

Do you understand that that is a meaningless question?
 
  • #27


ok Sir thanks a lot.
 
  • #28


It is very much relative na Sir?
 
  • #29


Rohit Mallya said:
It is very much relative na Sir?

Correct. Only the difference in potential values matter, not the potential values themselves.
 
  • #30


Potential is a potential capability to make work. If potential does not change, no work is done due to it. In this case it is not hidden but unemployed. So the absolute value does not say anything. Only differences does: U2 - U1 = work to change the bodies relative distance from the original position-1 to the final-2. Think of stretching and compressing a spring.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K