Why is Electric Potential Energy Defined in the Y-Direction Only?

AI Thread Summary
Electric potential energy is often defined in the y-direction due to the use of uniform electric fields in introductory physics. The expressions for force and potential energy, such as Fy = -q0*E and U = q0*Ey, are derived under the assumption of a consistent direction for the electric field. While electric fields can exist in multiple directions, focusing on the y-component simplifies the explanation and aligns with gravitational force concepts. The discussion acknowledges that this simplification is valid when the electric field is uniform. Understanding this context clarifies the reasoning behind the directional definition of electric potential energy.
Seraph404
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
My book first introduces expressions for work and energy by referring to concepts from mechanics and gravitation. It uses the familiar expressions F =mg (-y direction) & U=mgy to explain the expressions it gives for electric potential energy. However... I understand that the force due to gravity in the first couple of expressions is always downward, hence the negative y-direction. But when it gives the expressions for force and potential energy of a point charge, Fy = -q0*E & U = q0*Ey, I don't understsand why they define it with only the y-component. Doesn't it depend on the direction of your electric field? I mean... electric field doesn't always have to be in the y-direction, right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ah, never mind. I think it had to do with the fact that the electric field was uniform, so there was only one direction for the force to be exerted. Sorry about that.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'

Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'

So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
View full post »

Similar threads

Potential Energy of an Electric Dipole in a Uniform Field
Replies
11
Views
4K
Electric Potential vs Electric Potential Energy
Replies
4
Views
2K
When Electric Field is 0 is potential also 0?
Replies
3
Views
5K
B Ion Trap and Time-Varying Potentials
Replies
1
Views
1K
Derivation of the Potential Energy of an Electric Charge System
Replies
2
Views
4K
What is the origin of magnetic potential energy?
Replies
15
Views
5K
Why is electric potential present inside a conductor?
Replies
7
Views
2K
Electric Potential Energy of Point Charge Systems
Replies
2
Views
874
I Is the Poynting Vector Field the Only Factor in Energy Flow in Circuits?
Replies
16
Views
3K
Why does electric potential energy increase if you move against the field?
Replies
6
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top